Reading mode: Light Dark

At the Time it was great - now its just tired.

Go to last post
Waterwalker

Waterwalker

Member
Messages
16
Reaction score
15
Location
Doha, QA
I purchased this camera a long time back (2011/2012). It was a great little travel camera at the time but now when you look at the photos you can see she's past her prime. One thing I have to say is the build quality is extremely good. I have had this camera forever and it has taken its lumps with the best of them and never had an issue.

Lumix is a great brand, and to be fair, if the build quality is the same on the rest i might as easily moved to Lumix from Nikon instead of Fujiflim.
 
I just sold my FZ1000 and replaced it with the LX10 as a compliment to my new Z5. The LX10 takes great stills and great video in the smallest package you can hold. For 500 bucks it works great.
 
Waterwalker said:
I purchased this camera a long time back (2011/2012). It was a great little travel camera at the time but now when you look at the photos you can see she's past her prime.
Click to expand...
https://www.dpreview.com/articles/6028108083/panasoniczs10zs8

Which color is your tired ZS10? Blue? Silver? Black? I wish they offered a Pink colorway.

You gave "Excellent" to Kids/Pets category. You meant sitting still or running around?

ZS10a_slant.jpeg


b421314d0dbf4cb58c925ba3dc53fa8a.jpg.png


Your ZS10 is just fine. Don't blame the old lady. ;)
 
Last edited:
Yeah,

My apologies, i gave the wrong model number. I selected the LX10 - and should have selected the LX5. Sorry for the confusion.

--
Waterwalker
 
Last edited:
I appreciate your review...I'm looking at older cameras for my high school jr to take with him on a trip to Spain this summer. I was debating on him just using the PowerShot G10 he currently owns or something slightly newer and possibly different along with more compact/lighter weight. My only critique to your 4 year old comment is that there is no way you bought the LX10 in 2011/2012 as it didn't come out until 2016/2017...so are you confusing your camera gear or just your dates?
 
Mike Maciazka said:
... My only critique to your 4 year old comment is that there is no way you bought the LX10 in 2011/2012 as it didn't come out until 2016/2017...so are you confusing your camera gear or just your dates?
Click to expand...
FYI

Read all replies prior replying to the OP post.

aaab6bfce79b494d9d7a2107ee04efcc.jpg
 
Yeah, normally I do...however when it shows up as a review under a camera I type in, it doesn't show the whole thread. Better yet, perhaps the OP should have removed the post after making the mistake.
 
Mike Maciazka said:
Yeah, normally I do...however when it shows up as a review under a camera I type in, it doesn't show the whole thread. Better yet, perhaps the OP should have removed the post after making the mistake.
Click to expand...
* Now you're aware when replying to "old" posts to view the entire post.

* Users cannot simply delete post after it has received replies. The OP did reply as to his error.

Also when replying to "old" posts check the person's profile your replying to see if they're still active member. ;-)
 
Last edited:
Or, I'll continue doing as I do...I've been a member for 8 years...I've made very few comments or posts. Who cares. Don't like it, too bad, how's that? And that's being polite.

Actually, members can delete...not by themselves...but it can be done...just like I could have had my comment deleted....but if you'd like to continue responding back and forth, I'll make this thread go longer than necessary.
 
Mike Maciazka said:
.... Or, I'll continue doing as I do...I've been a member for 8 years...I've made very few comments or posts. Who cares. Don't like it, too bad, how's that?
Click to expand...
:-P
Mike Maciazka said:
...Actually, members can delete...not by themselves...
Click to expand...
Just rewording what I posted; user cannot "easily" delete post as I noted. Yes user can request the forum moderator to remove post, "ONLY IF" they are aware that they could request the forum moderator to remove post.

Apparently the OP was not aware thereof, or just figured it was easier to post about his mistake.
 
Last edited:
I have an even older ZS3, in an even nicer blue, and the next-in-the-series black TZ5: they're both mostly stored, but each still looks and works fine.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

bluevellet
  • User review User review
Good performance at a Bargain
Replies
1
Views
21K
DDoram
DDoram
Dick Dastardly
Ricoh GR- I get it now
Replies
9
Views
171K
rayvonn
R
MJ_Photo38
Which premium standard zoom to get?
2 3 4
Replies
68
Views
223K
Kevin Stephens
K
bluevellet
  • User review User review
Soft Spot For The 17mm f/1.8
Replies
15
Views
59K
baxters
B
bluevellet
  • User review User review
The Little Engine That Could
Replies
14
Views
53K
Isola Verde
Isola Verde

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top