What do you think of the new rumored dedicated Film Sims dial on the X-T50?

The way I see it, if I can assign the drive mode to either the rear or front command dial on the right side, I’d rather have it there for quick access than to have to turn that knob with my left hand. The film sims assigned there is fine by me for occasional access as I wouldn’t mind shooting jpeg under certain conditions and not have to edit afterwards.
The basic and I guess most used sims are there, and hopefully the three variable spots can be assigned to custom jpeg settings.
Those dials already have more than enough functions.

Front dial changes the following (function is changed by clicking the dial):
  • ISO
  • aperture (on lenses with no aperture ring)
  • exposure compensation (when the exposure compensation dial is set to C)
Rear dial fine tunes shutter speed when that parameter is set manually. Clicking the dial magnifies your view in manual focus.

I certainly hope no further functions are added to those two dials.
Valid argument. But it also depends on how one shoots and sets the camera up.
Well, isn’t that kinda the point? I’ve been shooting with both the X-T2 and X-T20 for many years using a very specific (and very similar) setup that works very well for me. That setup is based on the “classic” Fuji user interface common to both X-Tx and X-Txx cameras.

I have no problem with Fuji experimenting with different camera lines like the X-H and and X-S models, but what happens when when they go and significantly rejigger the classic camera interface? Well, now you’ve go a bunch of cameras that used to work in harmony with each other, but that now require fundamentally different setups and a mental rejiggering every time you pick up a different model. It’s beyond annoying and off-putting for long time loyal users and leaves little reason to stay with Fuji when their older models finally wear out. I want new cameras to replace my old ones that retain some familiarity, not a completely different interface (there are newfangled X-H and X-S cameras if I wanted to do that). I have no issue with the X-T5 - it is indeed a return to a natural progression from the X-T2 (and a big success and top seller, I might add), but the newer X-E, and X-Txx cameras are a total screwup, IMO. I was looking to maybe go with an X-T5/50 combo, but might just jump ship and go somewhere else when my Fujis finally wear out.
Yeah I get the idea. A matter of familiarity. When it comes to me I wouldn’t have two Fuji bodies, so I wouldn’t be concerned with continuity. Film sims are one of the star features of fujifilm, along with the classic dials and other features. So having those on a dedicated dial would somewhat push me to use them more. I mainly shoot in manual mode with auto iso. So I already have the shutter speed and exposure compensation on the top plate, and the aperture ring on most lenses, and the two clickable dials on the right side for whatever settings I wish to have, including the drive mode.
People on different platforms say that having a dedicated dial for film sims makes the camera more like a gadget and not a serious photographic tool, well I don’t get that. Again film sims are one of the main features of fujifilm.
 
Why not just provide an unmarked dial that can be reassigned to something else like the X-S10/20.
Unmarked dial may hurt product segmentation since user may assign unmarked dial as either
  • Umarked ISO dial
  • Metering dial
In addition, pricey X-T50 (if around $1299) may act as successor of X-T200 (for TikTok user record video via film simulation).

More worry are LCD will change to FAS like Nikon zfc?
 
Deeply horrible change IMO. Huge disadvantage to serious photographers, both because film sims are useless if you shoot RAW, and because having quick, convenient and reliable access to the drive modes is very important if you are shooting action/wildlife. Also being able to switch to video in a hurry is very important (an entire dial on the X-T4/5!!!)

This single-handedly makes me reconsider my plan to insta-preorder the camera. Along with the price, it makes the X-T5, despite being heavier than I want, look like a good deal all of a sudden. I don't even want an ISO dial, but having a film sim dial always there being completely worthless is offensive to me.

Am I being fussy? Yes. Why do I even buy Fuji cameras in the first place rather than cheaper technically-superior full frame cameras? Because I am fussy.

We haven't seen the whole camera yet


This is still just a rumor, so I wish I could think it's fake, but it seems real.

Still, it's possible there's another drive wheel on the camera somewhere, such as if it replaced the "auto" toggle switch under the shutter speed dial. It's probably not under this film sim dial, because that's where the flash release goes and I doubt they changed that.

If there is a drive wheel, that will help this decision not be such a train wreck, but the film sim wheel is still a really bad choice for serious photographers.

Dials are for quick changes

Suddenly having a fast subject and needing burst mode, or suddenly wanting to capture a video, comes up a lot in my experience.

Suddenly needing to change the film sim without lifting your eye from the viewfinder: Never.

Dials should be for things that you need to change quickly, not for things that you ponderously change when you are feeling bored, and can change in post-processing.

This dial should be customizable

As someone else said, this would be better as a blank dial because film sims are 100% useless to RAW shooters, though personally a drive dial strikes me as worthwhile.

We can dream that they will do the right thing with this dumb film sim dial and allow us to get the same effect as a "blank dial" by customizing it to act that way.

With the "C" position, it definitely looks like a wheel that can spin forever, so they should let us make it into a third generic wheel who's outcome we see on the screen. Letting us customize it this way would mean we also regain a custom button from elsewhere on the camera, since most of us probably have that "most important other thing" on a button somewhere.

I would probably make it control ISO, e.g. to shift between the three auto-iso modes by turning the dial.

You could also have it control drive mode, assuming there's no other physical control for that.

AF modes (wide/zone/point) would be another option you could switch between using the dial.

Honestly if they work that out, it will save this dial in my mind. Yeah it's ugly but as long as it's useful, I can forgive it.

Of course, they could have done the same with the drive dial if they thought it was useless, but they did this instead. I don't think they'll make this dial configurable, only that they absolutely should.

Hope the people who like this change really love it, because for those of us that use Fuji cameras as tools, this is a really big downgrade and waste of space.
Customer who wants unmarked dial may already want to use a6700 instead, I think X-T50 is a great fun camera
?? and change systems? A more useful suggestion would be to use the XT5 instead.

Frankly, I'd rather not have an unmarked dial, but one with something that's more useful to most of us: Drive, ISO, ..just not something that's only useful to JPG shooters.
 
Deeply horrible change IMO. Huge disadvantage to serious photographers, both because film sims are useless if you shoot RAW, and because having quick, convenient and reliable access to the drive modes is very important if you are shooting action/wildlife. Also being able to switch to video in a hurry is very important (an entire dial on the X-T4/5!!!)

This single-handedly makes me reconsider my plan to insta-preorder the camera. Along with the price, it makes the X-T5, despite being heavier than I want, look like a good deal all of a sudden. I don't even want an ISO dial, but having a film sim dial always there being completely worthless is offensive to me.

Am I being fussy? Yes. Why do I even buy Fuji cameras in the first place rather than cheaper technically-superior full frame cameras? Because I am fussy.

We haven't seen the whole camera yet


This is still just a rumor, so I wish I could think it's fake, but it seems real.

Still, it's possible there's another drive wheel on the camera somewhere, such as if it replaced the "auto" toggle switch under the shutter speed dial. It's probably not under this film sim dial, because that's where the flash release goes and I doubt they changed that.

If there is a drive wheel, that will help this decision not be such a train wreck, but the film sim wheel is still a really bad choice for serious photographers.

Dials are for quick changes

Suddenly having a fast subject and needing burst mode, or suddenly wanting to capture a video, comes up a lot in my experience.

Suddenly needing to change the film sim without lifting your eye from the viewfinder: Never.

Dials should be for things that you need to change quickly, not for things that you ponderously change when you are feeling bored, and can change in post-processing.

This dial should be customizable

As someone else said, this would be better as a blank dial because film sims are 100% useless to RAW shooters, though personally a drive dial strikes me as worthwhile.

We can dream that they will do the right thing with this dumb film sim dial and allow us to get the same effect as a "blank dial" by customizing it to act that way.

With the "C" position, it definitely looks like a wheel that can spin forever, so they should let us make it into a third generic wheel who's outcome we see on the screen. Letting us customize it this way would mean we also regain a custom button from elsewhere on the camera, since most of us probably have that "most important other thing" on a button somewhere.

I would probably make it control ISO, e.g. to shift between the three auto-iso modes by turning the dial.

You could also have it control drive mode, assuming there's no other physical control for that.

AF modes (wide/zone/point) would be another option you could switch between using the dial.

Honestly if they work that out, it will save this dial in my mind. Yeah it's ugly but as long as it's useful, I can forgive it.

Of course, they could have done the same with the drive dial if they thought it was useless, but they did this instead. I don't think they'll make this dial configurable, only that they absolutely should.

Hope the people who like this change really love it, because for those of us that use Fuji cameras as tools, this is a really big downgrade and waste of space.
Customer who wants unmarked dial may already want to use a6700 instead, I think X-T50 is a great fun camera
?? and change systems? A more useful suggestion would be to use the XT5 instead.

Frankly, I'd rather not have an unmarked dial, but one with something that's more useful to most of us: Drive, ISO, ..just not something that's only useful to JPG shooters.
I’m reading that a lot. Why should the film sims dial be useful to people who shoot only jpeg? I’d like to have a finished image right out of camera and not take time with editing later, but I’ll still have that raw file should I want to have a different look with the same image in the future.
 
If it is true, isn't this simply an attempt to attract the younger phone crowd that is filter happy?

JJ

--
Just a Dad documenting life...
 
Last edited:
The way I see it, if I can assign the drive mode to either the rear or front command dial on the right side, I’d rather have it there for quick access than to have to turn that knob with my left hand. The film sims assigned there is fine by me for occasional access as I wouldn’t mind shooting jpeg under certain conditions and not have to edit afterwards.
The basic and I guess most used sims are there, and hopefully the three variable spots can be assigned to custom jpeg settings.
Those dials already have more than enough functions.

Front dial changes the following (function is changed by clicking the dial):
  • ISO
  • aperture (on lenses with no aperture ring)
  • exposure compensation (when the exposure compensation dial is set to C)
Rear dial fine tunes shutter speed when that parameter is set manually. Clicking the dial magnifies your view in manual focus.

I certainly hope no further functions are added to those two dials.
Valid argument. But it also depends on how one shoots and sets the camera up.
Well, isn’t that kinda the point? I’ve been shooting with both the X-T2 and X-T20 for many years using a very specific (and very similar) setup that works very well for me. That setup is based on the “classic” Fuji user interface common to both X-Tx and X-Txx cameras.

I have no problem with Fuji experimenting with different camera lines like the X-H and and X-S models, but what happens when when they go and significantly rejigger the classic camera interface? Well, now you’ve go a bunch of cameras that used to work in harmony with each other, but that now require fundamentally different setups and a mental rejiggering every time you pick up a different model. It’s beyond annoying and off-putting for long time loyal users and leaves little reason to stay with Fuji when their older models finally wear out. I want new cameras to replace my old ones that retain some familiarity, not a completely different interface (there are newfangled X-H and X-S cameras if I wanted to do that). I have no issue with the X-T5 - it is indeed a return to a natural progression from the X-T2 (and a big success and top seller, I might add), but the newer X-E, and X-Txx cameras are a total screwup, IMO. I was looking to maybe go with an X-T5/50 combo, but might just jump ship and go somewhere else when my Fujis finally wear out.
Yeah I get the idea. A matter of familiarity. When it comes to me I wouldn’t have two Fuji bodies, so I wouldn’t be concerned with continuity. Film sims are one of the star features of fujifilm, along with the classic dials and other features. So having those on a dedicated dial would somewhat push me to use them more. I mainly shoot in manual mode with auto iso. So I already have the shutter speed and exposure compensation on the top plate, and the aperture ring on most lenses, and the two clickable dials on the right side for whatever settings I wish to have, including the drive mode.
People on different platforms say that having a dedicated dial for film sims makes the camera more like a gadget and not a serious photographic tool, well I don’t get that. Again film sims are one of the main features of fujifilm.
Yes, they are one of the star features - and it is absolutely awesome that I can test out multiple film sims in Capture One when i process the Raws to get the look I'm trying to achieve. I don't always know what film sim i want at the spur of them moment. This is another reason why the dial is of no/little benefit to RAW shooters.
 
The way I see it, if I can assign the drive mode to either the rear or front command dial on the right side, I’d rather have it there for quick access than to have to turn that knob with my left hand. The film sims assigned there is fine by me for occasional access as I wouldn’t mind shooting jpeg under certain conditions and not have to edit afterwards.
The basic and I guess most used sims are there, and hopefully the three variable spots can be assigned to custom jpeg settings.
Those dials already have more than enough functions.

Front dial changes the following (function is changed by clicking the dial):
  • ISO
  • aperture (on lenses with no aperture ring)
  • exposure compensation (when the exposure compensation dial is set to C)
Rear dial fine tunes shutter speed when that parameter is set manually. Clicking the dial magnifies your view in manual focus.

I certainly hope no further functions are added to those two dials.
Valid argument. But it also depends on how one shoots and sets the camera up.
Well, isn’t that kinda the point? I’ve been shooting with both the X-T2 and X-T20 for many years using a very specific (and very similar) setup that works very well for me. That setup is based on the “classic” Fuji user interface common to both X-Tx and X-Txx cameras.

I have no problem with Fuji experimenting with different camera lines like the X-H and and X-S models, but what happens when when they go and significantly rejigger the classic camera interface? Well, now you’ve go a bunch of cameras that used to work in harmony with each other, but that now require fundamentally different setups and a mental rejiggering every time you pick up a different model. It’s beyond annoying and off-putting for long time loyal users and leaves little reason to stay with Fuji when their older models finally wear out. I want new cameras to replace my old ones that retain some familiarity, not a completely different interface (there are newfangled X-H and X-S cameras if I wanted to do that). I have no issue with the X-T5 - it is indeed a return to a natural progression from the X-T2 (and a big success and top seller, I might add), but the newer X-E, and X-Txx cameras are a total screwup, IMO. I was looking to maybe go with an X-T5/50 combo, but might just jump ship and go somewhere else when my Fujis finally wear out.
Yeah I get the idea. A matter of familiarity. When it comes to me I wouldn’t have two Fuji bodies, so I wouldn’t be concerned with continuity. Film sims are one of the star features of fujifilm, along with the classic dials and other features. So having those on a dedicated dial would somewhat push me to use them more. I mainly shoot in manual mode with auto iso. So I already have the shutter speed and exposure compensation on the top plate, and the aperture ring on most lenses, and the two clickable dials on the right side for whatever settings I wish to have, including the drive mode.
People on different platforms say that having a dedicated dial for film sims makes the camera more like a gadget and not a serious photographic tool, well I don’t get that. Again film sims are one of the main features of fujifilm.
Not if you're a RAW shooter, they aren't, at all. Besides being the standard dial since the original X-T10, the Drive dial is useful for both RAW and Jpeg shooters (as an ISO dial would also have been). A Film Sim dial is a complete waste of space for a RAW shooter and should have no place on a camera line with an already well established user interface and many loyal users (and potential future up-grade customers). I've enjoyed my X-T20 for many years (and hopefully many more, as I won't be replacing it). I was hoping Fuji would, like with the X-T5, return to their senses and to the previously successful and very popular X-T20 interface but, alas, the X-Txx (and X-E) lines are dead to me now.
 
Besides being the standard dial since the original X-T10, the Drive dial is useful for both RAW and Jpeg shooters (as an ISO dial would also have been). A Film Sim dial is a complete waste of space for a RAW shooter
Fuji should learn from legacy Nokia phone (changable back cover) allow consumer purchase and replace own dials face into camera :
  • All dial face detachable, dial face connect to dial via strong magnetic
  • Consumer can purchase other premium dial face (e.g. titanium, cemanic, C1-C7) from Fuji.
  • Consumer can custom own dial sets E.g. Max ISO (until 3200) + Min SS + Exp Comp.
  • Consumer can change existing dial position according own needs.
  • In future, Fuji able release some special function dials. E.g. Control external flash via dial + camera bluetooth; eND...
 
but, alas, the X-Txx (and X-E) lines are dead to me now.
Erik, can you remind me again what it is about the X-E4 that kill it for you? I have an X-E3 that I like a lot for its very small size. I wanted an X-E4 but the loss of one of the command dials kills it for me.

But I seem to recall you saying the loss of a command dial was OK with you. It was some other feature losses that put you off it.
 
but, alas, the X-Txx (and X-E) lines are dead to me now.
Erik, can you remind me again what it is about the X-E4 that kill it for you? I have an X-E3 that I like a lot for its very small size. I wanted an X-E4 but the loss of one of the command dials kills it for me.

But I seem to recall you saying the loss of a command dial was OK with you. It was some other feature losses that put you off it.
Removing the m/c/s focus dial was the other big one for me. Thankfully that is still present on the X-T50 as far as we can see.

The X-T50 back command dial is still in Schrödinger’s box 💀
 
but, alas, the X-Txx (and X-E) lines are dead to me now.
Erik, can you remind me again what it is about the X-E4 that kill it for you? I have an X-E3 that I like a lot for its very small size. I wanted an X-E4 but the loss of one of the command dials kills it for me.

But I seem to recall you saying the loss of a command dial was OK with you. It was some other feature losses that put you off it.
Removing the m/c/s focus dial was the other big one for me. Thankfully that is still present on the X-T50 as far as we can see.

The X-T50 back command dial is still in Schrödinger’s box 💀
Fuji could remove that M/C/S and I'd be fine because the Tracking is now better/faster for focus and recompose than using the joystick. My XT5 and X100VI are almost always on AF-C.

But I'm glad its there for people who want it, and if I used MF a lot then I would use it.

--
www.darngoodphotos.com
 
Last edited:
but, alas, the X-Txx (and X-E) lines are dead to me now.
Erik, can you remind me again what it is about the X-E4 that kill it for you? I have an X-E3 that I like a lot for its very small size. I wanted an X-E4 but the loss of one of the command dials kills it for me.

But I seem to recall you saying the loss of a command dial was OK with you. It was some other feature losses that put you off it.
 
I don' t think any brand designs a camera only or primarily for RAW shooters. I think they design for a wide spectrum of shooters.

If this rumor is true, it might point to the idea that they are designing the X-T50 mainly for Jpeg shooters, since Fuji is known for great Jpegs.
 
but, alas, the X-Txx (and X-E) lines are dead to me now.
Erik, can you remind me again what it is about the X-E4 that kill it for you? I have an X-E3 that I like a lot for its very small size. I wanted an X-E4 but the loss of one of the command dials kills it for me.

But I seem to recall you saying the loss of a command dial was OK with you. It was some other feature losses that put you off it.
No, I’m definitely not OK with the loss of a command dial, that’s a big reason, but the loss of the MCS switch is a dealbreaker all by itself, I use it almost every time I shoot. The rear screen that flips the image upside down when you shoot at waist level, a significant shortage of customizable buttons, and no grip whatsoever are also problematic (and I’m probably forgetting some stuff). I would much prefer using an X-E3, but it’s loss of the d-pad, no tilt screen, and no highlight warning blinkies are problematic for me with that one and make the X-T20 my preferred small Fuji body.
I took a chance on the XE4 and it’s been my travel camera ever since. My only wish is that the viewfinder was a bigger and Fujifilm would do more to slim down their zoom lenses.

I could see myself trying the XT50, but I’ll have to give it some more thought.

Erik, from the sound of it, I think you’d enjoy the XT5. It’s also been a solid performer. I was glad I took it to New Zealand instead of the XE4 for the WR. Lots of rain and mist.
 
I don' t think any brand designs a camera only or primarily for RAW shooters. I think they design for a wide spectrum of shooters.

If this rumor is true, it might point to the idea that they are designing the X-T50 mainly for Jpeg shooters, since Fuji is known for great Jpegs.
And they are known for great RAW files that, when developed with the right software, produce better images IQ wise than OOC jpegs. Adjusting e.g. for WB with jpegs require some work on a PC /Apple anyway. So? It's all about the level of IQ the photographer aspires to, isn't? A film sim dial doesn't really change those facts.
 
but, alas, the X-Txx (and X-E) lines are dead to me now.
Erik, can you remind me again what it is about the X-E4 that kill it for you? I have an X-E3 that I like a lot for its very small size. I wanted an X-E4 but the loss of one of the command dials kills it for me.

But I seem to recall you saying the loss of a command dial was OK with you. It was some other feature losses that put you off it.
No, I’m definitely not OK with the loss of a command dial, that’s a big reason, but the loss of the MCS switch is a dealbreaker all by itself, I use it almost every time I shoot. The rear screen that flips the image upside down when you shoot at waist level, a significant shortage of customizable buttons, and no grip whatsoever are also problematic (and I’m probably forgetting some stuff). I would much prefer using an X-E3, but it’s loss of the d-pad, no tilt screen, and no highlight warning blinkies are problematic for me with that one and make the X-T20 my preferred small Fuji body.
I took a chance on the XE4 and it’s been my travel camera ever since. My only wish is that the viewfinder was a bigger and Fujifilm would do more to slim down their zoom lenses.

I could see myself trying the XT50, but I’ll have to give it some more thought.

Erik, from the sound of it, I think you’d enjoy the XT5. It’s also been a solid performer. I was glad I took it to New Zealand instead of the XE4 for the WR. Lots of rain and mist.
I saw you shared some photos a couple of months ago in the weekly Fujifilm thread. Can we look forward to a dedicated thread featuring some of your favs from the trip? Perhaps, along with a couple of stories about the adventure :)
 
I don' t think any brand designs a camera only or primarily for RAW shooters. I think they design for a wide spectrum of shooters.

If this rumor is true, it might point to the idea that they are designing the X-T50 mainly for Jpeg shooters, since Fuji is known for great Jpegs.
As an X-T20 owner and JPEG shooter, I would respectfully disagree.

I love the functionality of the X-T20 - rapid one touch access to a range of functions via the D-Pad (film sims, recipes, ISO, focus point) and the drive dial (Bracketing, CL, CH), as well as stock stuff via fn buttons (SS, Aperture, Exposure Comp). Without the drive dial and D-Pad, I lose most of this one-touch functionality. As well as the ‘look and feel’ which made the X-Txx series such a compelling proposition before the designers started to mangle it.

IMHO, the X-T50 has been designed by marketeers for a different audience to traditional X-Txx shooters. It will be more than likely used as a high quality point and shoot camera by this new audience, playing with the film sims as they go along.

Meanwhile, I’m left with 2 choices when I move on from the X-T20 - consider the X-T5 (too large) or look elsewhere. Given that I’m no longer part of Fuji’s target market, I’m not inclined to give them my business.
 
but, alas, the X-Txx (and X-E) lines are dead to me now.
Erik, can you remind me again what it is about the X-E4 that kill it for you? I have an X-E3 that I like a lot for its very small size. I wanted an X-E4 but the loss of one of the command dials kills it for me.

But I seem to recall you saying the loss of a command dial was OK with you. It was some other feature losses that put you off it.
No, I’m definitely not OK with the loss of a command dial, that’s a big reason, but the loss of the MCS switch is a dealbreaker all by itself, I use it almost every time I shoot. The rear screen that flips the image upside down when you shoot at waist level, a significant shortage of customizable buttons, and no grip whatsoever are also problematic (and I’m probably forgetting some stuff). I would much prefer using an X-E3, but it’s loss of the d-pad, no tilt screen, and no highlight warning blinkies are problematic for me with that one and make the X-T20 my preferred small Fuji body.
I took a chance on the XE4 and it’s been my travel camera ever since. My only wish is that the viewfinder was a bigger and Fujifilm would do more to slim down their zoom lenses.

I could see myself trying the XT50, but I’ll have to give it some more thought.

Erik, from the sound of it, I think you’d enjoy the XT5. It’s also been a solid performer. I was glad I took it to New Zealand instead of the XE4 for the WR. Lots of rain and mist.
 
I don' t think any brand designs a camera only or primarily for RAW shooters. I think they design for a wide spectrum of shooters.

If this rumor is true, it might point to the idea that they are designing the X-T50 mainly for Jpeg shooters, since Fuji is known for great Jpegs.
As an X-T20 owner and JPEG shooter, I would respectfully disagree.

I love the functionality of the X-T20 - rapid one touch access to a range of functions via the D-Pad (film sims, recipes, ISO, focus point) and the drive dial (Bracketing, CL, CH), as well as stock stuff via fn buttons (SS, Aperture, Exposure Comp). Without the drive dial and D-Pad, I lose most of this one-touch functionality. As well as the ‘look and feel’ which made the X-Txx series such a compelling proposition before the designers started to mangle it.

IMHO, the X-T50 has been designed by marketeers for a different audience to traditional X-Txx shooters. It will be more than likely used as a high quality point and shoot camera by this new audience, playing with the film sims as they go along.

Meanwhile, I’m left with 2 choices when I move on from the X-T20 - consider the X-T5 (too large) or look elsewhere. Given that I’m no longer part of Fuji’s target market, I’m not inclined to give them my business.
Well said. I’m in much the same boat and I completely agree.
 
but, alas, the X-Txx (and X-E) lines are dead to me now.
Erik, can you remind me again what it is about the X-E4 that kill it for you? I have an X-E3 that I like a lot for its very small size. I wanted an X-E4 but the loss of one of the command dials kills it for me.

But I seem to recall you saying the loss of a command dial was OK with you. It was some other feature losses that put you off it.
No, I’m definitely not OK with the loss of a command dial, that’s a big reason, but the loss of the MCS switch is a dealbreaker all by itself, I use it almost every time I shoot. The rear screen that flips the image upside down when you shoot at waist level, a significant shortage of customizable buttons, and no grip whatsoever are also problematic (and I’m probably forgetting some stuff). I would much prefer using an X-E3, but it’s loss of the d-pad, no tilt screen, and no highlight warning blinkies are problematic for me with that one and make the X-T20 my preferred small Fuji body.
I took a chance on the XE4 and it’s been my travel camera ever since. My only wish is that the viewfinder was a bigger and Fujifilm would do more to slim down their zoom lenses.

I could see myself trying the XT50, but I’ll have to give it some more thought.

Erik, from the sound of it, I think you’d enjoy the XT5. It’s also been a solid performer. I was glad I took it to New Zealand instead of the XE4 for the WR. Lots of rain and mist.
I saw you shared some photos a couple of months ago in the weekly Fujifilm thread. Can we look forward to a dedicated thread featuring some of your favs from the trip? Perhaps, along with a couple of stories about the adventure :)
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top