Daniella68313
Forum Pro
yes it was..It wasn't meant to be an insult....well maybe a little.but I stil dont, accept your insults. as if there is no problem
But really
yes but I don,t beleive that going back to point and shoot like you susggested will be of any help at all..I beleive that I would do better with a 10d.were talking a tool here. Not all tools work for everyone.
but that's all pretty much irrevelant now..exchange period is over and budget restriction. we get what we pay for...and the 300d is not a PRO camera..I have no doubt about that.
If it
sure it is predictable that it will react like that with partial meetering as the 300d is forcing on us when using central focusing point..surely it was no way to get other results...isn't working for you try something else. The metering work in a
predictable manner so i'm not sure it is a fault.
but that was not my point to begin with..if you read my original message..I said that there is no control over the meetering and the focusing mode..so no the 300d is not a PRO camera.
I understand very much that the meetering could not have done better than this for the partial meetering..and it is normal for a partial meetering to do this..but what I was angry about is that there is no other option. no evaluative.
In tough metering
you really have to own a 300d to understand how this can become frustrating. but since you always use partial meetering it works for 90% of the time in my case..would you have used partial or evaluative with that lemur shot?situations change methods. i check my histogram after almost every
shot. It has become just habit after fighting with my 10D the first
few weeks. It was like that wit the Minolta D7 took me awhile to
figure out that pretty much anything other that 100iso was going to
give me noisy pics. So I stopped changing iso. Pretty much got to
where it was manual set the Av to a good value for the desired dof
and just dial the shutter speed till the evf looked good.
they sure do. but that does not make the 300d a PRO camera no?We're talking work arounds. And all these cameras and lens each
have there quirks that need to be worked out.
can you honestly say that the 300d is a PRO camera?
Things I have learned
have you tried to track a bird in flight with it? it failed each time for me.with Canon dslr are, shoot raw, double check the histogram, use the
depth of feild preview button, watch your shutter speed and bump
iso as needed, tripods are very good things, ai focus is blessing,
some of these birds were quite bird in the frame and also coming toward me but it never kicked in..whereas it does kick in quite easily when I have slight camera shake at 300mm on contrasty objects.
http://www.pbase.com/zylen/300d_birds
in the case of the 300d yes because that's our best chance to get evaluative meetering...but I had very bad luck with it..it was often focusing on trees instead of a bird.and one that most will disagree with seven focus point is the way
to go most of the time.
When not in 7 point learn to move focus
then I guess the 10D works much better in that regard than the 300d..this is one of the major complain about the 300d.point fast instead of center and recomposing. 7 point and AIfocus
switching to aiservo makes getting sharp in focus moving shots very
easy.
----with teh 300d..but there is.
Bill
http://www.pbase.com/slowpokebill
'Sometime the magic works. Sometimes it doesn't'
I am not an English native speaker!
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918