DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Is it worth upgrading R6 mk1 to mk2 for wildlife/birding/BIF?

Started 1 month ago | Questions thread
Zeee Forum Pro • Posts: 25,627
Re: Is it worth upgrading R6 mk1 to mk2 for wildlife/birding/BIF?

steeldrake wrote:

I struggle to decide if i should spend a reasonably big amount of money to upgrade my R6 to mk2, I know the differences in specs but one thing really bothers me and if any of you have experience (or even can share example raws) on this, i would be happy:

I do lot of wildlife and BIF (birds in flight) with R6 and RF100-500, sometimes with RF1.4 extender. Still depending on subject and situation i often need to crop quite alot. Now 24 is not much more that 20 but i read a lot of info and experiences that the IQ and details are much better in mk2. Perhaps due to different AA filter or something similar.

So will you get a much better highly cropped image from Mk2?

I sometimes use Topaz gigapixel and it creates often anomalies in e.g. bird feathers. I also wonder if a more detailed original picture would generate less artefacts...

And finally if you have the experience, is the AF and animal/bird tracking really noticeable better in mk2?

Thanks for any help in the difficult question ;).

Have you seen this?

https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/66932700

-- hide signature --

Don't Look Up.

 Zeee's gear list:Zeee's gear list
Canon EOS R7 Canon EOS R6 Mark II Canon RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1L IS USM +1 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow