Re: I'm waiting for the R7 MK2
Zeee wrote:
charlyw64 wrote:
Zeee wrote:
Putting more thought to this. The R7 is the first body since my 20D that when I tried the burst I said what heck is this. At first I thought it was broken. I don't have the 7D2 anymore to compare vibrations but I know I did not react the same way when I tried it for the first time.
Memory can be forgiving - but also you were used to the noise DSLR make. You now have had quite a few mirrorless and you are comparing with those. I didn't, I still have the 7D, the 7DII and now new the R7, so I could make the direct comparison. Even with the 7DII in EFCS I get a slight shutter slap that shows up when taking macro shots (which is where my focus lies predominantly now) and I am shooting a series of images in short succession because I am photographing when the wind has just died down and my subject hasn't still fully settled down (not knowing when the wind picks up again). I look forward to using the ES when the situation arises, I just need to assess if the image quality suffers due to the 12 bit A/D conversion in ES, compared to the 14 bit A/D conversion in EFCS/MS...
Not sure what others think about this.
https://photographylife.com/14-bit-vs-12-bit-raw
Thanks for the article, I just said that the drop in A/D conversion rate merits examination, not that it was a big deal for me, especially as I usually work with the light so that the dynamic range is well below the threshold. I would like to see an article from a Canon user as Canon sensors usually have a much different characteristic than the Sony built Nikon spec used in the D810 of the above article...