Fuji X-H2 resolution?

Dylan10 wrote:

baobob wrote:

I own both XH2s and XH2. Yes XH2 gets abit more very fine details. It is not at all night and day vis à vis XH2s. IMO the advantage relies in the best cropping ability.

That was for res only. Images delivered by the XH2 are just superb especially if you print A3 a format that reveals the better res.

Some bad samples usually come from noisy files, and noisy files come from underexposed files. The 40megapix sensor needs quite a lot of light When might is dim, just expose to the right (ETTR) witha +2/3 to 1 EV compensation.

In landscape photography with trees and bushes, printed in A3, the XH2 is better than XH2s. There is also a learning curve for post processing, files can be damaged with too agressive PP (NR, sharpening).

Below a sample with the 18-300mm Tamron that I was evaluating with the XH2

The whole frame

details of lichens record the photo on computer to see it atb 100% (not the DPR viewer)

at 300mm 80m distance, slightly raiig while I was evaluating the combo

Here I get better results than with XH2s

Thanks for this, it really demonstrates the issues I see a lot in the second image, out of focus rendering behind the ridge tiles further back, is that natural to you?

Am I missing something here?

The photographer has focused on the ridge tiles.

Depending on the f-stop being used, there is the depth of field (DoF) that will come into play. (DoF is the distance between the nearest and furthest elements in a scene that appear to be "acceptably sharp" in an image.)

General principle I have used is that approx. 1/3 of the DoF in front of the focus point will be in focus and 2/3 behind the focus point will be in focus. Anything outside of that will be to a lesser or greater out of focus depending on how far it is away from the point of focus.

So in the above examples, the out of focus elements in the photograph are perfectly normal.