DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Which would be a good old low-cost body?

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
Humanitarian New Member • Posts: 7
Re: Which would be a good old low-cost body?
1

boogisha wrote:

Paulmorgan wrote:

[...] maybe an X-E1 or 2, cheap as well.

Depending on what features are desired, another vote for X-E1. I have X-T3 since it came out, being my main body and taking around 25k photos so far - but some time ago got X-E1 as well (being totally aware of all of its aged tech) for times I almost don`t want to think about the camera at all.

Don`t think it can get much cheaper than that. Of course, depending on the form you prefer, X-T10 or X-T20 (or X-E2 mentioned above, or X-E2s) could be an option, too. Just make sure to list the features you can`t live without, if any, not to forget these are older (and more modestly featured) cameras after all (but image quality hardly lacking, being what counts, too).

Another vote for XE-1 here also. Unless you really need that classic chrome, in which case I would say X-E2.

 Humanitarian's gear list:Humanitarian's gear list
Fujifilm X-E1 Fujifilm XF 23mm F2 R WR
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow