DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Is the RF 24-50mm a serious threat for crop RF camera's?

Started 1 month ago | Discussions thread
RLight Senior Member • Posts: 4,418
Re: MTFs

Foskito wrote:

RLight wrote:

RobertoHUN wrote:

Judging by the dpreview samples, the RF 24-50 is absolutely worthless, I'd rather buy a cheaper body and some better lenses. What's the point of using a fullframe body with a cr@p lens?

With respect, you're a Nikon shooter on a Canon forum, be kind. But, here you go.

Nikon should be scared of that R8. Makes the Z5 look, obsolete.

I am a Canon shooter and I don't care about charts, I rather judge images. The samples provided by DPR with the 24-50 look pretty bad. Nothing wrong with the camera, the issue is with that lens.

It’s no L, you can buy an L if that’s your fancy. But you can buy the 24-50 if portability is. Nothing wrong with choices. The R8 is the star of the show here (IMO).

DPR said it well, you can buy an R8 instead of an R6 II, with a 24-105L, for the same price as the R6 II alone.

 RLight's gear list:RLight's gear list
Canon EOS R3 Canon EOS R50 Canon RF 28-70mm F2L USM Canon RF-S 18-45mm Canon RF-S 55-210mm F5.0-7.1 IS STM
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
KEG
KEG
KEG
MAC
MAC
MAC
KEG
KEG
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
KEG
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow