and a teaching on how to do it differently and why this method is not relevant anyway. In my eyes the disrespectfulness is coming "from the other side" and his observation is spot on.
Well what relevant method do YOU use for shooting your landscapes?
R2
Try to think a bit outside the box. You are focusing very much on landscapes and "still lives".
The method the author describes is useful in general, without the focus on landscape. Read the initial post and you will see that first of all the method itself was described and only later landscape was mentioned as one example were the author is using this technique. But as you can also read in the initial post it can be used for "just about anything". So try to keep that in mind while suggesting different methods or before "condemning" the method. Think about the possibilities for various use cases.
For many years I was a "Canon only guy", I never used this method myself in the past, but since I got the Z6 and Z7 I discovered that this is a very viable and quick method of choosing the focus point and to my knowledge it can't be used with the same reliabilty on Canon bodys (at least not the ones I use) and it is one of the biggest low-lights of my EOS R5.
Just to give an example: Imagine a scene where you are shooting portraits. Your camera is not static / on a tripod but you are moving freely around. You have a thin DOF and snap away happily with subject/eye detection. Suddenly you see the opportunity to focus on a different detail in the scene (e.g. the person holding some flowers or some details in the outfit) and you want to quickly snap different compositions with the additional detail (that can't be detected by the subject/eye detection algorithms), maybe even while the face is still visible. With Nikon or Sony you just hit a button, "lock in" the other detail, freely move and snap happily away.
With Canon that is much harder to achieve in my experience. If the face is still visible you will have to deactive subject detection or use different focus methods. But when not being static, moving around and re-composing you will typically have to adjust the area you are focusing on. I do this by switching to single point AF, using the EVF and selecting the focus point via the touch screen ("touch and drag AF"). Depending on how fast and often you recompose this is serious work. And if you want to use subject/eye detection in between you will always have to cycle through the AF methods. With Nikon you can jump from subject detection to fully controllable "any object tracking mode" and back again with only one additional button press. It is quite a bit faster. To be honest, it is hard to explain and to get excited about if you have never used it. Here is an example video (should start at 6:42):
He is using the joystick at the beginning to shift the position of the tracking focus field, this is of course not necessary (guess he is doing it because his camera is on a tripod and he wants to start with the figure in the center). And of course this is again a somewhat static setup, in realworld usage you will be moving yourself much more for e.g. weddings.
Here another very quick example on how to switch really fast between any object tracking and subject detection (3:41) (just watch the next 10 seconds):
Update: This is actually the best video, at 7:50 he demonstrates fast toggling between eye AF and tracking.
Maybe you can see the usefullness to have this mode and kind of tracking performance.
It is almost like Canon, Sony, Nikon, etc all have different AF systems. Also seems they all have different upsides and downsides. Neat.
As for locking onto a focus point My R3 and R7 can do this in a way that sounds like the inverse of Sony and Nikon. Enable\Disable [Subject Tracking].
On my R3 I have this mapped to one of the 4 front buttons and I my R7 I have it mapped to the one front button. Turn off [Subject Tracking] and the focus point is locked on the selected focus point turn [Subject Tracking] back on and the AF system will be actively looking for something to focus on.
Quick video of this:
I personally rarely use this as the Cameras seem pretty much clairvoyant in knowing what I want to focus on.
Fujifilm's X-H2 is a high-resolution stills and video camera, that sits alongside the high-speed X-H2S at the pinnacle of the company's range of X-mount APS-C mirrorless cameras. We dug into what it does and what it means.
Holy Stone produces dozens of low-cost drone models aimed at consumers. We look at the HS710 and HS175D to see if they stack up to other sub-250g offerings. Are these secretly great or more like toys?
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.