m100
•
Senior Member
•
Posts: 2,048
Re: How substantial is the image quality difference between M50 and M6 markii?
R2D2 wrote:
thunder storm wrote:
MAC wrote:
But customers never learn. They will happily get the R10, think about lenses later on, locking themselves up in the third never complete Canon aps-c platform.
Well you’ll have to plop me in that “happily stupid/naive” category then!
I’ve recently been mentoring a budding photographer (high school student) and they wanted to upgrade the older Nikon DSLR they’ve been using for Photojournalism at school. I immediately recommended the Canon R10 + RF 18-150 kit as being the best fit for them in regard to its capabilities, cost, size, and future-proofing! (They spent their savings on it). Plus they now get a “teacher” who’s intimately familiar with the system.
Note: that last part about obsolescence is the only reason I didn’t recommend the M6ii to this youngster.
I also get to share a lens or two with them (RF 35/1.8 IS for starters, EF-S 55-250 IS in spring), so they’ll have a pretty good idea what direction they’ll want to head from here.
Personally, I really wouldn’t mind owning an R10 myself. It’s comfortable with great ergo and superb AF (DIGIC X). And I already own all the lenses I need for it! Hmmm 🤔
R2
Sounds too complicated ?
Mac and I are focusing in on using 1 fantastic prime projected onto 32mp into PL6 ?
I sold all my less than 32mp stuff.
I have tried R5 files with PL and WOW !
These new pixels are super duper !
Have to have more and more mp for my PL !
Less than 32mp is just not modern ?