DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

How substantial is the image quality difference between M50 and M6 markii?

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
R2D2 Forum Pro • Posts: 26,528
Re: How substantial is the image quality difference between M50 and M6 markii?
2

vostokstreetphoto wrote:

I've been trying to understand how substantial the jump in image quality is between the two cameras, but the only thing I find are general claims that M6 mark ii should be quite a bit better. While that is clear from a tech standpoint, how does it translate in practice? A few comparisons I did find used the kit lens and didn't really tell me much.

The question assumes that we're using the best lens for the mount: Canon 32mm 1.4, Sigma 56, Canon 22mm etc.

Hello,

I have the one year older M6 to compare to (24 MP), and not the M50, but they’re pretty similar in IQ from what all the reviews show.

With the M6ii you’ll get a slight bump up in detail (when images are equalized for output size), and a little better noise handling (likely due to the finer-grained character of the noise).  DxO seems to do a little better with the 32 MP files.

The bigger differences between the M50 and M6ii lie in their capabilities, features, and ergos however.  You’ll have to see how any of that fits with what and how you shoot.  And as always it’s best to try one out in person if at all possible.

Best of luck to you!

R2

-- hide signature --

Good judgment comes from experience.
Experience comes from bad judgment.
http://www.pbase.com/jekyll_and_hyde/galleries

 R2D2's gear list:R2D2's gear list
Canon EOS M6 Canon EOS M6 II Canon EOS R5 Canon EOS R6 Canon EOS R7 +1 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
KEG
MAC
MAC
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow