CANON 90D vs CANON R10

davev8 wrote:

thunder storm wrote:

John Photo wrote:

thunder storm wrote:

CompleteUtterNonsense wrote:

thunder storm wrote:

The problem: at this point it's uncertain if Canon will bring out RF-s replacements for all your current EF-s lenses. The 18-135mm is kind of replaceable with the RF-s 18-150mm (check AF speed though), the 50mm is a full frame lens and can be replaced by the RF 50mm f/1.8 stm. A wide angle zoom will likely happen, but to my eye it's highly unlikely we will see something like that EF-s f/2.8 standard zoom for the RF mount.

Is there anything wrong with adapting the EF-S lenses to the R10? From everything I have read, there is not penalty for adapting.

Nothing wrong with it, but the M50 will give you the same IQ as the R10 at a much lower price point, while replacing current lenses for RF-s lenses comes at a risk you will replace those twice if you have to move full frame because the RF-s lens line up won't become complete enough for your needs.

I would think this is an advantage since you don't need to replace the lens.

The same is true for the M50. Go check prices of used M50s. It's a steal. Shoot it for 4 years and you will know a lot more about glass availability, while the R10 will have come down in price what you've payed for that M50. You can decide then if you want to go with an RP or an R10 or whatever options Canon will have in 2027.

The availability of RF-s glass is pretty much unknown for now. \

True. However, glass that works well in not limited as R, EF, and EF-S glass all works well.

So the only advantage of the R10 over the M50 is the compatibility with R glass.

yes.... apart from....

"The only advantage" should be understood within it's context:

glass that works well (with the R10) is not limited, as R, EF, and EF-S glass all works well.