CANON 90D vs CANON R10

thunder storm wrote:

John Photo wrote:

thunder storm wrote:

CompleteUtterNonsense wrote:

thunder storm wrote:

The problem: at this point it's uncertain if Canon will bring out RF-s replacements for all your current EF-s lenses. The 18-135mm is kind of replaceable with the RF-s 18-150mm (check AF speed though), the 50mm is a full frame lens and can be replaced by the RF 50mm f/1.8 stm. A wide angle zoom will likely happen, but to my eye it's highly unlikely we will see something like that EF-s f/2.8 standard zoom for the RF mount.

Is there anything wrong with adapting the EF-S lenses to the R10? From everything I have read, there is not penalty for adapting.

Nothing wrong with it, but the M50 will give you the same IQ as the R10 at a much lower price point, while replacing current lenses for RF-s lenses comes at a risk you will replace those twice if you have to move full frame because the RF-s lens line up won't become complete enough for your needs.

I would think this is an advantage since you don't need to replace the lens.

The same is true for the M50. Go check prices of used M50s. It's a steal. Shoot it for 4 years and you will know a lot more about glass availability, while the R10 will have come down in price what you've payed for that M50. You can decide then if you want to go with an RP or an R10 or whatever options Canon will have in 2027.

The availability of RF-s glass is pretty much unknown for now. \

True. However, glass that works well in not limited as R, EF, and EF-S glass all works well.

So the only advantage of the R10 over the M50 is the compatibility with R glass.

yes.... apart from the R10 has

almost 50% more batty life

2 control dials

joystick

DPAF in 4K vid

no 4K 30P crop down sampled from 6K

4K60P vs 30P

HD 120p vs 60p

bit rates up to 470 MBS vs 120MBS

23 FPS vs 10 (only 7,5 with AF-c

eye AF

animal AF

car AF

651 VS 143 af POINTS

UHSii SD card

partial metering

center weigted metering

average metering

spot meting AF point

USB charging

apart from all that what have the Romans ever done for us????????

For a crop sensor that's a pretty poor advantage. The sharpness of non L zooms is so so on a crop sensor. The L zooms are too expensive for a crop sensor, and the same is true for the L primes. The non L primes are good enough for IQ, but ironically it are the non L EF primes that will give you fast USM AF to make the most of the improved AF of those RF crop bodies whereas the RF primes only have slow stm AF.....

The M50 can be used with the ef-m 11-22mm, ef-m 32mm f/1.4 stm and Sigma 56mm f/1.4. On crop that's unbeatable compared to all the R glass options. The 11-22mm might come to the RF mount, but for the other 2 primes it's the M50 having the best glass options.

Another approach would be to shoot the 600D for one more year. I think that makes sense given the black box of the future RF-s situation.