CANON 90D vs CANON R10

amos roth wrote:

Hello, I decided to replace my old CANON 600D, which I owned for +10 years.

Since all my lenses are CANON / for CANON (18-135IS, 50mm 1.8, 17-55mm 2.8, Sigma 10-20mm), I've doubts about 2 optiion: the CANON 90D, or to switch to mirrorless - the R10 (which is approx. the same budget).

After reading many reviews, I'm afraid the the R10 will be like "enrty lelvel mirrorless camera", as the 600D was when I purchased it more than 10 years ago (of course with update technology), and if I want to step forward to the next level of cameras, than the 90D is a good option, unless I'll pay much more for a mirrorless like the R7 or R.

I'm shooting mostly landscapes, and street photography.

I would like to from others which had same doubts.

Amos Roth

Well Black Friday would have been the perfect time to get it. I think it was as much as $200 off, now I think it's about $100 off. I have been considering both the R10 and the R7 in the Canon Lineup. But I am also closely looking at other Brands. I have ZERO brand loyalty.

I mostly shoot Nature/Wildlife but will shoot almost anything other than people. I personally would wait to see if they actually bring out the R8 which is supposed to sit between the R7 and R10. Plus they actually may have a another model below the R10 coming out.

Personally, unless one is doing paid Professional Work, the R10 should be just fine for Landscapes and Photography. In fact, most moderns cameras should be fine. My biggest issue with the Camera is the lack of IBIS.