DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Sigma 16mm f/1.4 or just keep the Canon 22mm f/2

Started 2 months ago | Questions thread
nnowak Veteran Member • Posts: 9,074
Re: Sigma 16mm f/1.4 or just keep the Canon 22mm f/2
2

StrugglingforLight wrote:

MAC wrote:

ScentedOrange wrote:

Thats the thing, Im also always asked if I can use my "fancy camera" to capture family photos outside when everyone is leaving, having the wide angle plus the ability to shoot a bit faster might be useful.

Im mostly concerned about being able to take photos of shops and buildings in the dark, so not totally low light. (personally im night blind, if I cant see I know the cameras sure cant lol)

actually, you bring up a point where your m200 in low light would struggle achieving auto focus by 3 stops worse than the m6II and by 2 stops worse than the m50II

if buildings in the dark are your application, I'd be concerned about the -2 versus the better low light bodies (-5 and -4)

M200

EV -2 - 18 (room temperature, f/1.4, ISO 100,

M6II

EV -5–18 (at room temperature, ISO 100, f/1.4,

M50II

Working Range EV -4 – 18 (ISO 100 equivalent with F1.4 lens attached)

note - your m10 is even worse at EV of 1 at f2 which would be EV of 0 at f1.4 - that is a whopping 5 stops worse than m6II

Working RangeEV 1-18 (at 23°C, ISO 100, with EF-M 22mm f/2 STM)

What is the difference between the M50II and M200? I thought they both shared the same internals as well as the original M50.

Same internals.  The M50 II and M200 are running updated firmware.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow