davev8
•
Veteran Member
•
Posts: 4,833
RF-S 18-150mm sharper than the RF24-105F4L?
CamerEyes wrote:
For those who bought the bundle of either the R10 or the R7, any feedback on how you find the EF18-150mm lens? Have an option to purchase one for $300 U.S. and it's practically brand new since the owner bought it with a package and only tested it for a few shots but uses his EF70-200mm almost hundred percent of the time for sports.
Plan to use it for travel (landscape, cityscape, street), when having a couple of primes may not be practical.
TIA!
here is a vid comparing the 18-150 to the RF 24-105 both on a R7,, the 18-150 seems amazing sharp ..but remember the 24-105 is a FF lens and is disadvantaged when fitted to APS-c but nobody would complain about the performance of the 24-105 on APS-c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxDr67weTGQ
-- hide signature --
.
.
.
.
Attention Dislexsic i mean dyslexic person... This post will have many although spell checked, spelling and grammatical errs ..its The best its going get so no need to tell me it is bad I know it is .....................................................................................................
the EOS M is not dead and wont be for a long time ....as long as you don't want a flagship camera with a VF...if that's the case it died sometime ago
My 5D IS a MK1 classic
.........................................................................................................
There is no argument for FF vs APS-c (or m43) with shallow DOF..as it's a law of physics and a very subjective personal thing if you want to make use of the shallow DOF only FF can offer
.....................................................................................................
If you wait for a camera that will tick all your boxes ....by then you will have more boxes to tick..... so the wait continues .....David Appleton