DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Fuji's X-T1/2/3/4/5 AF & sensor evolution compared

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
musicmaster Regular Member • Posts: 109
Re: Fuji's X-T1/2/3/4/5 AF & sensor evolution compared

Seems like there's a minor evolution between the X-T3 and X-T4 where it gets the eye a little more frequently. On the other hand, the X-T5 gets the Eye AF way more often and from much further away, with a mask and turning around too.

That said, I wonder what the real-world difference is between the 3, 4 and 5 as far as actual in-focus rates.

It's so weird, because coming from years of DSLR shooting and a really poor implementation of "smart" AF on my Canon M5, my X-S10 seems to really blow me away in how good it seems to actually hit faces on my tests. I can't imagine how much better Sony or Canon can actually be for normal shooting.

One thing I'm curious about is zone AF for sports. I shot college sports for 4 years with my Canon 40D and 7D and a 70-200 2.8 for my school paper. I had no issues in single point or zone AF with those cameras and had a pretty high hit rate with plenty of keepers over the course of the game. How bad can my Fuji be with the same single point or zone setup? I assume it has to be similar to those old DSLR's, right?

 musicmaster's gear list:musicmaster's gear list
Canon EOS M100 Nikon Z5 Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM Canon EF-M 15-45mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM Nikon Z 24-70mm F4 +2 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow