Lack of sharpness at f1.8 on Canon 50mm STM
AnthonyL
•
Veteran Member
•
Posts: 3,686
Re: Lack of sharpness at f1.8 on Canon 50mm STM
SD19194 wrote:
AnthonyL wrote:
A couple of things come to mind with my limited experience:
- Copy variations. I had the pre-STM version and it was more than sharp enough for me. Unfortunately I shot some photos at a restaurant and it being so small I left it on the **** table and only realised a few weeks later
- The specs for PDAF focussing are something like within 1 DOF - ah I found that I documented a post from some time back:
Canon spec is to focus with in one depth of field for standard lenses and with in 1/3 depth of field for lenses faster than F/2.8. All Canon cameras focus with the lens wide open regardless of what aperture you have the camera set at.
Here's a post by RD Kirk that explains it:
(quote)
"If the camera places the actual focused plane within the depth of focus range, the intended focused plane of the subject should "look sharp" on a 6x9-inch print from a distance of 10 inches. In "high precision mode" the intended plane of focus should "look sharp" on about an 11x14-inch print at 10 inches (extrapolating from the standard size given by Canon for normal mode).
This standard is important to understand. If you use high precision mode and view the image on a monitor at 100 percent of the original pixel resolution, do not expect the actual plane of focus to coincide with the intended plane of focus. It's not necessarily going to do that--it's only designed to get close enough to "look sharp" at the standard final display enlargement size and viewing distance. If it does that much, then it's doing its job as designed.
If you're operating at normal AF precision, the camera will happily settle for any point within the depth of focus range (and not necessarily the same place every time--randomness within limits is what "tolerance" means in this context).
If you need optimum sharpness at greater than the standard final display sizes and viewing distances, then yes, you'll have to focus manually. However, a lot of focusing problems are caused by users not realizing that even autofocus requires learning certain techniques, some similar to the techniques of using a manual split-image rangefinder.
(end of Quote)
- Have you tried a focus test with contrast detection/live view to see whether it is the PDAF or the lens that is the issue?
Unfortunately I wouldn’t have the first clue how to do this
What camera do you have? Does it have a live view screen on the back? If so look up the instructions to shoot with live view, its focussing is more accurate than what you have been doing.
Canon EOS 700D
Canon EF-S 10-22mm F3.5-4.5 USM
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS
Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM
+5 more
|
Post
(hide subjects)
|
Posted by
|
When
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum
PPrevious
NNext
WNext unread
UUpvote
SSubscribe
RReply
QQuote
BBookmark
MMy threads
Color scheme?
Blue /
Yellow
We're Noct messing around with this review.
Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom impress in a lot of ways, but their noise reduction lags the competition and their lens corrections lack a real-world basis. DxO PureRAW 3 aims to come to their rescue without totally reinventing your workflow!
The Sony ZV-E1 is the company's latest vlogging-focused camera: a full-frame mirrorless camera based the FX3/a7S III sensor, aimed at YouTubers and 'creators' looking to go pro.
The Sony ZV-E1 is a full frame camera targeting YouTubers. Chris and Jordan are Youtubers, what do they think?
Fujifilm's X-H2 is a high-resolution stills and video camera, that sits alongside the high-speed X-H2S at the pinnacle of the company's range of X-mount APS-C mirrorless cameras. We dug into what it does and what it means.
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.