MAC
•
Forum Pro
•
Posts: 18,487
Re: How Do You Like the RF-S 18-150mm?
Photato wrote:
CamerEyes wrote:
For those who bought the bundle of either the R10 or the R7, any feedback on how you find the EF18-150mm lens? Have an option to purchase one for $300 U.S. and it's practically brand new since the owner bought it with a package and only tested it for a few shots but uses his EF70-200mm almost hundred percent of the time for sports.
Plan to use it for travel (landscape, cityscape, street), when having a couple of primes may not be practical.
TIA!
I usually stay away from these super zoom lenses, but since it is currently the better option out of the only two true native lenses available I went ahead and got it as a kit with the R10.
It turned out to be a good decision since it is has been better than expected, perhaps I got lucky with a good copy, who knows.
I compared it with almost all my other lenses where they share same focal length and I was surprised how sharp it is for such a long FL range, (with or without lens corrections).
It works best as a general purpose lens in good light, it is convenient, fun and light weight, it is relatively compact for what it does, but a bit longish compared to primes, probably twice as long as the other kit lens, so I wouldn't call it ultra portable.
But it focus fast, accurately and is very quiet, the OIS also works great.
One of my biggest surprises was that it almost matches the same resolving power as my Panasonic P&S superzoom FZ1000 at 400eqv vs this lens 240eqv ! mostly due to the sensor differences but still a great performance.
For landscape and cityscape might be narrow at 18mm (29mm eqv) but you already knew this. If this lens started at 15mm, instead of 18, it would be perfect IMO.
So, it is a very good lens if you can live with its limitations, mainly small apertures and not being wide enough at the wide end.
good summary
lens changes would drive me crazy since 24 mm on my RF 24-105 F4L is a staple for me