MAC
•
Forum Pro
•
Posts: 18,487
Re: It’s like they trying to wipe the M6ii off the earth
nnowak wrote:
rz64 wrote:
justmeMN wrote:
rz64 wrote:
If you want, you can permanently repeat "M is dead". However, this does not make any other system better.
Saying "M is alive" won't force Canon to release new M models.
I think it will officially be over if/when Canon releases an APS-C R that's priced like the M50.
I just wonder why some forists obviously think, that there is need for repeating (permanently) that "M is dead".
"If" Canon releases an APS-C R that's priced like the M50, what should be the reason for M-users to follow that path? For me, there would be none.
To my mind, Canon won't release RF-s lenses which are comparable to 11-22mm, 32mm, Sigma 16mm and 56mm. Why should they? They want you to upgrade to R and buy expensive R-lenses. So, there is no interest for Canon to offer competitive, small, inexpensive and even bright RF-s lenses.
For me, the M-system fits perfectly to my needs.
I just wonder why some forists obviously think, that there is need for repeating (permanently) that RF-S must directly duplicate EF-M.
The EF-M mount has never been a priority for Canon. In turn, converting EF-M system owners to RF-S or RF is also not a priority for Canon.
Even with the broad success of the M50 and M50 II, the system has barely been an afterthought for Canon.
My m32 f1.4 and my m11-22 and my m6II were "barely an afterthought"? The only afterthought with this is that they gave us way too much for the $ and will be sure not to do that again with RF-s
you have never used this great gear
and you base your comments on some old clunky Canon gear you use to own
on the other hand, close to zero knowledgeable users would choose your fuji gear to do 90 % of your shooting with 1 lens and 1 camera with jpg output for sports to boot - yet we are to believe you are an expert on all thing's photography and all things Canon? Are you a plant over here in Canon Land for the competition?