k1 pixel shift - can you see the different?
OP
Peace_VN
•
Regular Member
•
Posts: 389
Re: k1 pixel shift - can you see the different?
flektogon wrote:
JeremieB wrote:
flektogon wrote:
MaKeR wrote:
I can see the difference, and it's clear that *89.PEF is the Pixel Shift image. The other one is less sharp and has false detail.
Yes, this explanation is fully supported by the sampling theorem! Any good lens like mentioned Pentax 100/2.8 Macro can project as a maximum around 35 mega-details/points on a full frame sensor. So a camera with 36 Mp is (theoretically) capable register all those details. However, every "extra" detail above 18Mp will be accompanied with another, false detail.
I'm sorry but that's a slightly misleading way to describe the Nyquist theorem
First it should be 9Mp - sampling theorem applies on both rows AND columns.
Then it's wrong to talk about MP and details, the theorem applies on frequencies.
When we shoot with the simulated AA filter of Pentax, the sensor still scans 36MP but there's no moiré, why ? Because details are not MP
With the pixel shift your camera behaves like having a 144Mp sensor, so it will be (again, theoretically ) capable of registering 72 mega-details without any aliasing. Well, there are no lenses capable delivering so much details, but still.
So, if looking into difference between a single and shifted image, don't look at the amount of details, rather at a lack of false details (moire).
Don't be sorry, I am fully aware that what I wrote was (a little bit ) misleading. Of course, for and a 100% reconstruction of the sampled original and avoiding any aliasing, the sampling frequencies in both directions have to be 2 times greater than the highest frequency component of the original (i.e. the maximum lp/mm resolution of a lens). But practically this is not used in the digital photography. If it was, then for example, such a camera like Pentax K-1 with a 36 Mp sensor with (fully) engaged AA filter would not deliver more than 9 mega details. What we see, all digital cameras, even those with built-in AA filters, deliver something like 40%-60% of their sensor resolution. Look for example at the DXOMark lens reviews. Well, I just simplified it to 50% .
I though k1 has no AA?
|
Post
(hide subjects)
|
Posted by
|
When
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum
PPrevious
NNext
WNext unread
UUpvote
SSubscribe
RReply
QQuote
BBookmark
MMy threads
Color scheme?
Blue /
Yellow
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 9, 2022
|
Jun 23, 2022
|
Jan 1, 2022
|
Aug 24, 2021
|
We're Noct messing around with this review.
Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom impress in a lot of ways, but their noise reduction lags the competition and their lens corrections lack a real-world basis. DxO PureRAW 3 aims to come to their rescue without totally reinventing your workflow!
The Sony ZV-E1 is the company's latest vlogging-focused camera: a full-frame mirrorless camera based the FX3/a7S III sensor, aimed at YouTubers and 'creators' looking to go pro.
The Sony ZV-E1 is a full frame camera targeting YouTubers. Chris and Jordan are Youtubers, what do they think?
Fujifilm's X-H2 is a high-resolution stills and video camera, that sits alongside the high-speed X-H2S at the pinnacle of the company's range of X-mount APS-C mirrorless cameras. We dug into what it does and what it means.
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.