DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

How can Sigma make sure the FFF is the best success it can be? Locked

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
This thread is locked.
Scottelly
OP Scottelly Forum Pro • Posts: 18,026
Re: How can Sigma make sure the FFF is the best success it can be?

Iain G Foulds wrote:

Tom Schum wrote:

If the full frame Foveon is not feasible, let's have an APS-C implementation, but let it be Foveon.

… Exactly. The FF venture is a great waste of time and capital. No one can tell the difference in a FF image vs an APC. FF is a microscopic advantage at much greater expense to the consumer for basically no reason.

We don't know this. I don't agree, frankly. I believe that at ISO 100 a full-frame sensor will offer lower noise levels, and more pliable raw files, that will be superior to what the Merrills and Quattros can produce . . . even the SD Quattro H. At least I hope that is what the full-frame sensor will provide. Of course that can't be assumed. I think it can be expected though. Why else make a full-frame sensor?

-- hide signature --

Scott Barton Kennelly
https://www.bigprintphotos.com/

 Scottelly's gear list:Scottelly's gear list
Sony SLT-A65 Nikon D810 Sigma sd Quattro H Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-400mm f/4G ED-IF VR Sony DT 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 SAM +27 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow