DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Those who have 55-200, was it worth getting the 55-250?

Started 3 months ago | Discussions thread
rz64 Regular Member • Posts: 454
Re: Let's keep it OT, ok?
2

Alan WF wrote:

I am kind of interested in one of the crop Rs as soon as they hit M50 pricepoint.

I'm not interested in crop Rs at ALL. No matter the pricepoint.

Let's try to keep the conversation on-topic.

If someone is interested in an R, then there is a specific advantage to an EF/EF-S lens over a similar EF-M lens, and that's relevant for this discussion.

However, I don't think stating personal positions on R in this context really helps anyone.

Regards,

Alan

Since this is an EOS-M forum I think it is acceptable in any case, if someone is stating that "there is no interest in crop Rs at all".

Additionally, the topic is a comparison of an EF-M lens with an EF/EF-S lens. So, at first sight, there is no connection to the R-system.

 rz64's gear list:rz64's gear list
Canon EOS M6 Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM Canon EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM Canon EF-M 15-45mm F3.5-6.3 IS STM +3 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
KEG
KEG
KEG
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow