A tiny and personal test of some EVF

JeremieB wrote:

Kerusker wrote:

JeremieB wrote:

Sjak wrote:

Kerusker wrote:

That's almost a vibrant hate declaration against the very essence of photography

Not at all. It says nothing about the art of photography. [...]

I believe Jeremy's post was a humorous one, not a serious one

You could even use "sarcastic" maybe

Excuse me. I'm not a native speaker and as such it's always difficult for me to understand jokes etc.

'vibrant hate' is strong wording which doesn't follow by 'vibrant lough' on my side.

I took it seriously but not personally.

Good Light to you all (or should I say 'High Contrast'?)

Sorry about this, I'm not native speaker either but for some reason I can't help trying to make jokes in english sometimes - I should avoid this alltogether.

That being said, even in my native language others do not always understand my jokes

So yes, nothing personal at all, not even really serious, but what you wrote could really be understood as a strong criticism against photography - this is what I found funny.

JeremieB

I have to admit that I thought you were criticizing using digital photography, because you considered it ugly. Just as ugly as the image in the EVF. I thought you might be a film advocate. So, there you go. Sarcasm is not easy.

I know it was more a reminder of the limitations of photography versus "what we can see".

Good light and moderate saturation to you