I'm sorry to revive this thread but I noticed you own an S5 and an S1R. Do you perceive any difference in color/tonality between them or are the files easily matched?
Since you resurrected this thread, I am going to go on a rant here...
Look at a red color chip (or red nail polish, or something you would consider "red" color) with one eye open and the other eye closed. Now look at it again, this time switching which eye you have open, and which one closed.
When I do this, my left eye sees red slightly brighter and slightly skewed toward orange.
My right eye sees red slightly darker and slightly skewed toward magenta.
The differences are very small, but they are noticeable if I really pay attention.
Unless EVERYONE who is going to be looking at the photos has matching high-quality monitors that are perfectly calibrated, and under ideal lighting conditions, and who perceives colors the same way that your eyes do, you might be tilting at windmills.
Also, things like which lens you use, and what the lighting conditions are, will have a larger effect on color.
For example, when mounted on either my S1 or S5), my Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM and my Minolta MD 50mm f/2 have different color when shot at the same subject, and my Panasonic 24-105, when shot at 50mm, has different color as well.
I wouldn't be surprised if there are notable variations in color between the various Panasonic prime lenses, which were designed to match each other well in most other areas.
And don't get me started about lighting conditions. A lens might have a particularly pleasing color rendition under one lighting condition, but not under another (even after adjusting white balance and tint).
Oh, one more thing: Remember how Sony colors are "green" and ugly??? Well, Tony Northrup (yeah, I know, I know) did a blind test with viewers of his channel and found that the viewers overwhelmingly liked Sony colors.
And since I am on a rant this morning, I thought once again I would remdin people that bokeh is overrated. Yeah, I know it has NOTHING to do with the topic at hand, but I'm on a roll so no point in trying to stop me:
Topaz Labs' flagship app uses AI algorithms to make some complex image corrections really, really easy. But is there enough here to justify its rather steep price?
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.