Thinking of getting a third body - R6II or second R7
OP
tsinvest
•
Senior Member
•
Posts: 1,600
Re: Thinking of getting a third body - R6II or second R7
R5D4 wrote:
tsinvest wrote:
Hi All,
Before I switched to Canon I had 3 Nikon bodies and found it very useful to have a camera at the ready without having to change lenses. I had two crop bodies and one full frame. I do a lot a bird photography but I also want to branch out to other genres, landscape and street photography.
So now I have the R5 and the R7. Both great cameras in my opinion. I really enjoy the R7 with the kit lens (18-150mm). They both do very well with the RF100-500 lens. Probably keep that on the R7 for further reach, however the R5 does very well with that lens as well, most likely because of the higher mp.
Now I am considering either the R6II or another R7. I am leaning to the R6II for a good all a rounder and for good low light shooting. I have 5 RF lenses that I can use on all of these bodies so over time I can kind of see which lens I want on each camera. Maybe it sound like I'm being overindulgent however, it's my hobby and the cost is not a factor, and I like the convenience of 3 bodies.
Any thoughts appreciated.
Thanks, Tom
I would suggest that 2 bodies are more convenient than 3. There is no practical way to fit 3 bodies with lenses mounted into just about any camera backpack I know of. But having a 3rd lens in the bag, detached and ready to swap seems like a much more logical carry solution. I shoot 2 bodies on the regular for weddings and I can't imagine using 3 bodies under any circumstance. Swapping lenses is way more convenient than lugging around a 3rd body with a mounted lens (and the accompanying increase in bag / roller suitcase size that would require).
I guess I should have clarified. I would never carry three bodies with me, rather I shoot a lot from where I live and sometimes I need to grab a camera and lens and scoot outside to take a shot, usually birds. This being the case I always keep one camera with the 100-500 lens on it to get my shots. Then for inside shots or on the road shots I would normally not take the 100-500 setup unless I was going specifically for birds. So, I am usually only carrying one camera with me, with another at the ready for any nature shots around my house. I usually don't want to switch out the 100-500mm lens unless I have a specific reason to. So that is my situation.
Canon G7 X III
Canon EOS R5
Canon EOS R7
Canon EOS R10
Canon RF 35mm F1.8 IS STM Macro
+6 more
|
Post
(hide subjects)
|
Posted by
|
When
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
4 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
3 months ago
|
1 |
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum
PPrevious
NNext
WNext unread
UUpvote
SSubscribe
RReply
QQuote
BBookmark
MMy threads
Color scheme?
Blue /
Yellow
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 22, 2023
|
Feb 13, 2023
|
Feb 11, 2023
|
Feb 11, 2023
|
Fujifilm's X-H2 is a high-resolution stills and video camera, that sits alongside the high-speed X-H2S at the pinnacle of the company's range of X-mount APS-C mirrorless cameras. We dug into what it does and what it means.
Holy Stone produces dozens of low-cost drone models aimed at consumers. We look at the HS710 and HS175D to see if they stack up to other sub-250g offerings. Are these secretly great or more like toys?
It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good?
After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts.
Released only weeks apart, the Sony 50mm F1.4 GM and Sigma F1.4 DG DN Art are clear competitors. Which is the better buy?
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.