Hugh Brownstone's review of Sigma's 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN (vs XF 16-55 f/2.8)
Nov 30, 2022
13
Hugh Brownstone, of Three Blind Men and An Elephant Productions, which I consider one of the better reviewers of photographic equipment on Youtube has recently uploaded his take on Sigma's new X-mount 18-50mm f/2.8 lens. Whilst discussing the lens he saw fit to pit it not against the XF 18-55mm f/2.8-4, but his own XF 16-55 f/2.8.
The review is very interesting and I recommend it to anyone interested in either one of those lenses.
Here is a very brief (and devoid of all the nuances present in the video) summary of his findings, for those who can't take a look at the video :
Mr. Brownstone begins his review by claiming he finds the Sigma 18-50mm is on par or better in terms of AF and IQ with the Fuji 16-55mm.
He believes the 16-55mm is "no longer competitive with the most performant Full-Frame competitors, if the highest level of I.Q. is what you need or want".
The fact that Fuji's lens lineup needed an upgrade is demonstrated by the fact that when testing the original XF 23mm f/1.4 against the Sigma 18-50 at 23mm, the Sigma demonstrated superior I.Q.
Testing results:
His testing shows both lenses to be fairly well corrected for focus breathing
Both lenses displayed smooth and quiet AF in video
The Fuji generally had better aberration correction across focal lengths and apertures.
The Sigma edged out the Fuji for contrast in backlit testing scenarios.
As far as I.Q. goes, both lenses traded places for sharpness across focal lengths and center vs edge of frame but generally one behavior was consistent:
Sometimes, the Sigma was notably sharper than the Fuji.
Other times, the Fuji was marginally sharper than the Sigma.
Sigma's performance is noteworthy, as it accomplishes this in a dramatically smaller, lighter and far less expensive package, while having a level of weather sealing.
The Sigma was dramatically sharper and displayed better contrast and aberration correction at 2.8 than the first generation Fuji XF 23mm f/1.4 prime (Note: this lens is known for having huge sample variation).
Fuji's XF 18mm f/1.4 however was, "next-generation" better than all the aforementioned lenses.
He considers the 18mm f/1.4's performance as the minimally acceptable standard, if Fuji is to stay thoroughly competitive with FF.
Conclusion:
The Sigma is approximately as good as the 16-55 - Fuji's best holy trinity standard zoom, for just about half the price, while being substantially smaller and lighter.
If he needed a standard zoom in X-mount, he'd go with the Sigma 18-50mm, however he concedes the Sigma's aberration correction is very annoying and the lack wider 16mm focal length of the 16-55 is something he would miss.
Nevertheless, the Sigma delivers better on the premises of a smaller than Full-Frame sensor camera - a smaller and lighter camera system:
Fujifilm X-H2 + XF 16-55 f/2.8...............46.7 oz/1323 g
Panasonic S5 + Sigma 28-70 f/2.8.......43.2 oz/1224 g
Sony A7 IV + Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 G2...42-6 oz/1207 g
Fujifilm X-H2 + Sigma 18-50 f/2.8........34.2 oz/969 g
Yet on balance, the Sigma delivers similar optical performance that, courtesy of the 16-55mm f/2.8 was considered "as good as it gets". The Sigma is thus an easy recommendation for the value conscious folks.
He considers a shame that Sigma doesn't yet offer an "Art" version of this lens, but he gets that the total package of an Art would probably diminish the argument that a smaller sensor means a smaller camera system.
Mr. Brownstone concludes by stating it is fair to say that Fuji needs to update the 16-55mm as soon as possible, bringing its performance, size and weight in line with the new Fuji f/1.4 primes and exceeding the performance of the Sigma 18-50mm with the aim to match current Full-Frame 24-70mm lenses from Sony and Nikon.
However, for those who don't need the absolute best I.Q., this also presents an opportunity to either get into the the X-mount or expand its current X-mount lens collection for very affordable prices.
The Sony a7CR is a high-resolution addition to the company's compact full-frame a7C series. So what did we make of it and where does it leave the a7 IV that it sits just above?
Lomography's LomoChrome '92 is designed to mimic the look of classic drugstore film that used to fill family photo albums. As we discovered, to shoot with it is to embrace the unexpected, from strange color shifts to odd textures and oversized grain.
The LowePro PhotoSport Outdoor is a camera pack for photographers who also need a well-designed daypack for hiking and other outdoor use. If that sounds like you, the PhotoSport Outdoor may be a great choice, but as with any hybrid product, there are a few tradeoffs.
The Sony a7C II refreshes the compact full-frame with a 33MP sensor, the addition of a front control dial, a dedicated 'AI' processor, 10-bit 4K/60p video and more. It's a definite improvement, but it helps if you value its compact form.
Why is the Peak Design Everyday Backpack so widely used? A snazzy design? Exceptional utility? A combination of both? After testing one, it's clear why this bag deserves every accolade it's received.
If you want a compact camera that produces great quality photos without the hassle of changing lenses, there are plenty of choices available for every budget. Read on to find out which portable enthusiast compacts are our favorites.
What's the best camera for travel? Good travel cameras should be small, versatile, and offer good image quality. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for travel and recommended the best.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? This price point gives you access to some of the most all-round capable cameras available. Excellent image quality, powerful autofocus and great looking video are the least you can expect. We've picked the models that really stand out.
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.