Your precious and honest opinions about differences between Fujifilm and others (Sony, Canon, Nikon)

nemendes wrote:

I am happy with my equipments and Fujifilm brand in fact I just don't get it that photographers told people something but done another. If they love Fujifilm so much or if they think that nowadays aps-c cameras really close to ff cameras, why are they saying every time that 'for professional work ff, for myself fujifilm'?

I'm not sure who is supposedly saying what, exactly. If you're talking about so-called "influencers" on youtube, they're trying to make a buck drawing views to their videos, so who cares what they say ? To the extent one of them is competent and honest, it could very well be that they use and like one FF brand, but acknowledge that Fuji is excellent, too. Just because they review a camera they like doesn't mean they should go out and switch brands.

And maybe that's what your friends are trying to tell you: they like things about FF systems better, but that doesn't mean you should go out and switch.

I just switched from APS-C to FF. Why ? Not for IQ (I used an XS10 for over a year and the IQ was all I'd ever need). But because I like carrying as few lenses as possible and Nikon's 24-200 is an excellent compromise that covers the range used in 90% of my photos. Does that mean anything to you ? No! It shouldn't. I don't shoot anything for money and you wouldn't use a 24-200 for your pro work. My point is: stop worrying about what anyone else uses.

A lot of pros appreciate f/2.8 zooms on FF bodies and what those lenses can do. If you're not finding any shortcomings with your kit, who cares what they use.