DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Poll, R mount and 3ed party lenses

Started 4 months ago | Polls thread
Canon_Guy
Canon_Guy Senior Member • Posts: 1,486
Re: Poll, R mount and 3ed party lenses

thunder storm wrote:

noggin2k1 wrote:

Canon_Guy wrote:

noggin2k1 wrote:

Sure, if you go hunting through Canon's EF back catalogue, I'm sure you'll find some anomalies where modern 3rd party lenses may perform better.

However, compare modern with modern, and the 3rd party lenses just won't compare.

Didn't read the whole of your beef but this statement is as wrong as it can be.

What I love about modern Sigma Art lenses is that they deliver 95-100% of the image quality of the Canon RF lenses but for 30-50% lower prices.

Sigmas like 14-24/2.8, 40/1.4, 105/1.4, 135/1.8 are fabulous class leading lenses for very reasonable prices.

IQ wise yes, AF no.

I wonder if RF 50&85mm f/1.2 are really better than the Sigma 40&105mm Art.

We're solely talking about 3rd party EF lenses not offering "full native" AF experience.

There's really nothing more I could wish for with the 40 and 105mm Art.

I think I know what: the full native AF experience- whatever nonsense it means... .

 Canon_Guy's gear list:Canon_Guy's gear list
Canon EOS R6 Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM Sigma 14-24mm F2.8 DG HSM Art Sigma 105mm F1.4 DG HSM Art Canon RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM +6 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow