DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

After 50 weddings with the R3's

Started 9 months ago | User reviews thread
noggin2k1
OP noggin2k1 Senior Member • Posts: 2,950
Re: Low light rating of "great"?

Reservoir_Dog wrote:

Batdude wrote:

noggin2k1 wrote:

Sebastian1x wrote:

Thank you for sharing your experience and knowledge of the R3 from … 50 - weddings, wow! Can you elaborate a bit more regarding your comment or wish for better high ISO-performance? I thought the R3 would be an improvement in that regards compared to R5.

Sebastian

I think the R3 may be a very marginal improvement over the R5, but nothing particularly noticeable.

I'm not afraid of a bit of noise at high ISO, it's more so the degradation of colours. It's by no means a criticism of the R3, as it's very comparable to the best cameras on the market in this area - more of a "in the coming years if I change my R3's or a R3 II is released, it's the area I'd want to see improvements in to make me change cameras".

I can't afford no R3, but, am a "potential" new customer for the rumored R6II which is supposed to have the same sensor as the R3.

Its NOT the same sensor....

I think we're all aware of that now - and I'd expect even the most optimistic of potential R6II buyers never truly believed it would be.

 noggin2k1's gear list:noggin2k1's gear list
Canon EOS R3 Sony a7 IV Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L II USM Canon EF 35mm F1.4L II USM Sigma 105mm F1.4 DG HSM Art +7 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
MAC
MAC
MAC
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow