Canon M7 as the last M series camera?

Larry Rexley wrote:

AdamT wrote:

MyM6II wrote:

I have never had a photo destroyed by shutter shock. (And I have taken a lot.)

I bet there are a fair few taken with IS Zooms and the Mech shutter which delivered far from the full capability of the sensor for that lens though ...

Whatever it`s not an argument, its a fact that it does it, has been proven on here many times in many threads and canon have the power to fix it - Defending them about it over the years has let them get away with it .. It`d be a good thing for owners and sales of the last bastion of EOS-M to do it, people who want RF will get the R7 or R10 anyway - they can`t even be bothered to port the M 11-22 and the primes over to RF for those native-lens starved cameras which is ridiculous as it6`d be pretty much Zero R&D and we know how good they are .

- my post was about that an M7 isn`t needed (although an M5-II Would have been fantastic) , all they need to do is add EFCS to the otherwise pretty spot-on M6-II at minimum cost

I have now every EF-M zoom, and two M6 Mark ii bodies. I have owned 4 other copies of the 15-45. I have tried and tried to repro this so-called shutter-shock issue with both bodies using mechanical shutter at the speeds people say it happens, with the lenses they say it happens, and can't do it. And I am a pixel-peeper who views all my images at the pixel level while processing. So I am not in the camp where it is a 'fact.' I think something else is going on.

I also think shutter shock is a misnomer... if it does not occur with prime lenses, how can it be shutter shock?

I have around 10k frames with my M6ii and I have never encountered this issue a single time.