DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

M200 vs M6 II for video

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
OP drif8r Contributing Member • Posts: 597
Re: M200 vs M6 II for video

nnowak wrote:

In case you are considering it, the M50/M50 II have the same video limitations as the M200.

Depending on how serious you are planning to get into video, and what focal lengths you will need, you may be better served by shooting 4k video on a smartphone.

I already have M50 mk1 along with 22mF2, 15-45 and few adapted EF lenses.

I am happy with FHD video and stills with this combo.

M200 share batteries with M50 mk1 which is plus, however it lacks Flash hot shoe.
I am happy with EOS-M system in general, I need a back-up body since Canon may stop producing new ones.

Other option is M50 mkII, how much improvement is there over Mark I?

Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow