Will X-T5 video quality be worse than X-T3/4?
Re: Will X-T5 video quality be worse than X-T3/4?
2
ap356 wrote:
Based on the specs - it seems like the video quality of the X-T5 might actually be worse than the X-T4, and possibly even the X-T3.
The only option for over-sampled 4k requires a crop, whereas the 4 and 5 used the full sensor. Will it actually look worse than the older cameras?
I have no problem with the X-T5 not being a huge upgrade in terms of video capabilities, but having it actually get potentially worse is a bit weird...
Otherwise I would be happy enough to just get the X-T4 now, but I prefer the tilt screen
I wouldn't buy the XT5 if I wanted to shoot any video at all. The screen is a hinderance for me and what I need.
Which is why I own the XH2. Gives me everything I need for video and photo stills. Fuji's lineup is about as perfect as it can get right now. It has a camera for everyone.
Ricoh GR III
Leica Q2
Fujifilm X100V
Fujifilm X-Pro3
Leica M11
+1 more
|
Post
(hide subjects)
|
Posted by
|
When
|
|
|
|
|
5 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 months ago
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 months ago
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 months ago
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
2 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
2 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
5 months ago
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 months ago
|
|
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum
PPrevious
NNext
WNext unread
UUpvote
SSubscribe
RReply
QQuote
BBookmark
MMy threads
Color scheme?
Blue /
Yellow
We're Noct messing around with this review.
Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom impress in a lot of ways, but their noise reduction lags the competition and their lens corrections lack a real-world basis. DxO PureRAW 3 aims to come to their rescue without totally reinventing your workflow!
The Sony ZV-E1 is the company's latest vlogging-focused camera: a full-frame mirrorless camera based the FX3/a7S III sensor, aimed at YouTubers and 'creators' looking to go pro.
The Sony ZV-E1 is a full frame camera targeting YouTubers. Chris and Jordan are Youtubers, what do they think?
Fujifilm's X-H2 is a high-resolution stills and video camera, that sits alongside the high-speed X-H2S at the pinnacle of the company's range of X-mount APS-C mirrorless cameras. We dug into what it does and what it means.
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.