DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Seriously, Canon?

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
unhappymeal Senior Member • Posts: 2,620
Re: Seriously, Canon?

thunder storm wrote:

unhappymeal wrote:

EF-M was a few lenses away from being everything I wanted in mirrorless.

I'm still happy with the pictures I made with my M50, 18-35mm f/1.8 Art and the added speedlite + Gary Fong.

If Tamron (or Sigma) ever bothered to give them a fast zoom or if Canon ever made a proper f/4 standard zoom and something like the Sony G 70-350 (or Nikon 300mm f/4 PF), I would be shooting it today. Such wasted potential.

I agree with you in general, although the AF speed of the stm lenses was becoming an Achilles heel in my opinion. Ironically Canon is making the same mistake again with compact RF primes....

I can completely agree with the STM. It's borderline criminal that they didn't give their halo lens, the EF-M 32mm f/1.4, an USM and OIS. At the end of the day, Canon is stingy. Canon shooters need to know they'll be eating the infamous hammer going in on non-L lenses.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
KEG
KEG
KEG
KEG
KEG
KEG
KEG
KEG
KEG
KEG
KEG
KEG
KEG
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow