DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Studio Shot Comparison Tool Fujifilm X-H2S

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
gaul Senior Member • Posts: 1,516
Is APS-C really smaller, lighter, cheaper ecosystem than FF?
1

Doppler9000 wrote:

gaul wrote:

Dragonmatrix88 wrote:

I am using the studio comparison tool to look at the Fujifilm X-H2S camera and compare it to the OM Systems OM-1, Canon EOS R6 and Nikon Z6II and looking at the comparisons it looks like the fuji is creating very soft images. Either this or it is very slightly out of focus, does anyone have any experience with the X-H2S compared to any of those other cameras that can confirm which it is? I have looked at both the RAW and JPEG versions and see the same thing. A few places where this is very evident (at least to me) would be on the Beatles patch just to the left of center of the comparison tool, the stitching seems much less defined and softer. Another place to look would be the paint brushes on the upper left and lower right of the comparison tool, the bristles seem softer and less defined than any of the other cameras. Or is it maybe just me?

FF is always going to win vs APS-C .. Better IQ ..
once you realize that .. there is no going back to APS-C, at least as a primary system

33x44mm is always going to win vs FF. Better (potential) IQ.

54x40mm is always going to win vs 33x44mm. Better (potential) IQ.

Once you realize that, then you understand that you have to match your system to your needs, constraints, including budget and weight, then decide. Unless you print big, better IQ potential may be irrelevant.

Is APS-C really smaller, lighter, cheaper ecosystem than FF?

that’s the question

 gaul's gear list:gaul's gear list
Canon PowerShot S30 Canon PowerShot G1 X Canon EOS 6D Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM5 Canon EF 50mm F1.4 USM +7 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow