Critique and question
Re: Critique and question
phazelag wrote:
User1303423862 wrote:
phazelag wrote:
I totally don't mind critiques. Critiques have been super helpful over the years.
All taken with M50 with with Loawa 9mm F2.8 Zero D. Which does not register in Exif . Set to F11 and infinity focus.
First photo was my favorite, second photo the Zero D shows quite of bit of D in the lower left airplane. The 3rd photo is for reference to see the plane straight and undistorted.
I did download and apply the Venus Optics Lens profile but that only seemed to correct minimal vignetting and some aberrations but does not seem to correct distortion. Might not be possible as manual distortion correction didn't really help. Its not a huge deal, this lens is great and rarely has this issue, but I would like to know what caused this. Was it my angle to the plane and just have to live with it? Can it be corrected? Also the photo was cropped so it not even in the far corners.
I would like to know if the first photo is appealing or is the plane just too far away to make a good subject? Kind of reminds me Icarus! And the lady is very happy looking.
I also notice DPReview can not present photos great in full screen mode on occasion. Let me know if these look clear when you see them.
They look fine on my monitor, nicely exposed, good photos. Others will have more knowledge on rectifying the distortion than me.
I think my approach would have been to take a zoom lens to an airshow. For 'setting the scene' I'd have orientated to portrait at wide angle and taken a series of shots to stitch together using software later. That would have dealt (pretty much) with distortion issues.
Then I'd have been able to zoom in for the 'Icarus' shot to get more resolution. I could have used the tele end of the zoom to get more detailed shots of individual planes too.
The main thing is that you enjoyed the event, and got some memorable captures with your super-wide lens.
Thank you for your feedback!
I also had the 11-22 with me and I took most of the shots with an R7 and RF100-400. The M50 was mainly to get another perspectives. So I was thinking like you would have.
Haha! OK. I'd have taken my M6 and EF-S 50-250 IS + Rexley special 2X TC for an 800mm (equivalent) reach, so I could see which brand of cigarettes the pilots were smoking.
-- hide signature --
I am not a number. I am a free man.
How the heck did I end up with this username?
Canon EOS R
Canon EOS M6 II
Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM
Canon EF-M 28mm F3.5 Macro IS STM
Canon 70-300 F4-5.6 IS II
+4 more
|
Post
(hide subjects)
|
Posted by
|
When
|
|
|
|
|
5 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
5 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
5 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
5 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
5 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
5 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
5 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
5 months ago
|
|
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum
PPrevious
NNext
WNext unread
UUpvote
SSubscribe
RReply
QQuote
BBookmark
MMy threads
Color scheme?
Blue /
Yellow
Fujifilm's X-H2 is a high-resolution stills and video camera, that sits alongside the high-speed X-H2S at the pinnacle of the company's range of X-mount APS-C mirrorless cameras. We dug into what it does and what it means.
Holy Stone produces dozens of low-cost drone models aimed at consumers. We look at the HS710 and HS175D to see if they stack up to other sub-250g offerings. Are these secretly great or more like toys?
It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good?
After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts.
The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. We think it rises to the challenge.
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.
