rz64 wrote:
nnowak wrote:
KEG wrote:
nnowak wrote:
thunder storm wrote:
nnowak wrote:
Lepewhi wrote:
I was trolling the camera store this afternoon. I found the Canon R10. Has anyone had any experience with this camera? I'd never heard of it. Thanks for any info.
This summer, Canon launched the R10 alongside the R7 as the first RF mount cameras with crop sensors. At this time, the only crop specific RF mount lenses are the 18-45mm f/4.5-6.3 and the 18-150mm f/3.5-6.3. However, there are several full frame RF mount lenses that are relatively small, light, and inexpensive that would work well on the R10 such as the 16mm f/2.8,
24m f/1.8,
the 24mm f/1.8 inexpensive? I'm not saying it isn't reasonably value for money on a full frame camera, however, reasonable value for money isn't the same as inexpensive, and that's especially true when talking crop sensor performance. It's kind of the same thing as the EF 40mm f/2.8 stm adapted to an RP. That 40mm can be found used at 1/4th of the price of this RF 24mm.
In the USA, the RF 24mm is only $599. Not cheap, but certainly affordable, especially given the capabilities.
but is it actually available, as in you can walk into store and buy it available?
Yes, the RF 24mm is in stock and available. The EF 40mm, on the other hand, is discontinued and out of stock.
I can support thunderstorm concering the costs of the lenses. Here are the prices for the aformentioned lenses in central Europe:
16/2.8 - 320 €
24/1.8 - 750 €
35/1.8 - 520 €
50/1.8 - 200 €
100-400/5.6-8 - 700 €
If you choose RF, you have to accept higher costs, both for the bodies and for the lenses.
He could maybe use the opportunity to explain why 3 major electronic resellers in 4 countries only show M50 mk II as the display model.
And your comment "there are several FF RF lenses that are relatively small, light and inexpensive" must be precised, since there are only two inexpensive lenses. Especially the 24/1.8 must be excluded, at least here in our region.