Review of the Nikkor Z 70-200 f2.8 VR S

Started 3 months ago | User reviews thread
OP Rich Rosen Veteran Member • Posts: 3,471
Re: Review of the Nikkor Z 70-200 f2.8 VR S
2

Terrible Photographer wrote:

Meh, I mean it's good, it's a little weak at 200mm, vignettes a ton, the 70-200FL is near-identical in acuity.. It's FINE, but there's room for obvious improvement.

I've had two, thinking my first one was less-than-stellar, but no, that's just how it is. Below 135mm, yeah it's basically perfect. Above that though, it's OKAY.

There's always room for improvement. The lens isn't perfect...I make that clear in a segment of my review. And yes, it is weakest at 200mm. I don't know of a zoom lens that isn't weakest at its longest (and in some instances widest) focal length. But among current 70-200 lenses this lens is among the best. At 200, its more than just ok.

-- hide signature --

Rich Rosen

 Rich Rosen's gear list:Rich Rosen's gear list
Nikon D1X Nikon Z6 II Nikon Z fc Sigma 1.4x EX DG Tele Converter Nikon Z 50mm F1.8 +20 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow