Re: Is Old Fuji Color Better? Or Even Different?
6
FujiShooterCY wrote:
Marco Cinnirella wrote:
Here is a non-technical observation as a long-time Fuji raw shooter (currently have LR, C1 and PL5). I moved through the ranks from X-E1, X-E2, X-T1, X-H1 to X-T3. My subjective experience is that in terms of colour and tonality I find it takes me longer to achieve subjectively pleasing results from my X-T3 raws
...with your processing software at its default setings...
than it does from my X-H1 or T1 raws. I find the raw converter implementations of Fuji film sims more pleasing on the T1 and H1 raws.
...inside your processing software at its default settings...
When I first did a shoot with my T3 I was quite taken aback by how the raws looked in LR and C1
...because LR and C1 both have different sets of their default settings for different Fuji sensors...
- somehow much less obviously Fuji than H1 or T1 raws and I found myself dissatisfied with the raw converter interpretation of the in-camera auto WB.
...so there is no reason to blame the sensor itself for this...
Just my personal experience. I can get images more or less to look how I want them but as I said, I seem to have to spend more time on my T3 raws before I’m happy with the conversion. I do feel that Fuji, Adobe and C1 seem to between them be making RAF conversions look more like files from C, N or S. just my subjective view.
...and here is an idea of how to overcome this burden with the help of darktable, and I am now in the process of learning the workflow for that.
I worded my observations very carefully so as to avoid making conclusions about the sensors and just focus on my experience
-- hide signature --
https://www.flickr.com/photos/marcoc/
"When words become unclear, I shall focus with photographs. When images become inadequate, I shall be content with silence." Ansel Adams.