Serious question about "worms" and RAFs

Started 2 months ago | Discussions thread
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Marco Cinnirella
Marco Cinnirella Veteran Member • Posts: 8,133
Serious question about "worms" and RAFs
1

Not trying to be facetious but I have C1, LR, PL and I can sometimes see "worms" in the raws processed in any of these softwares.

One question I have to those who shoot professionally - has any client ever specifically rejected delivered images or critiqued them because they have pixel peeped at 100, 200 or 400% and noticed "worm artefacts" ?

Has any client ever specified that you must process your raws in C1 or else specified you must not process your raws in Adobe software?

I know this has been done to death but I just processed an image today that yes has some worming but only if you view at 200% and while my immediate reaction was to reach for C1 instead of LR, I then thought - will anyone ever look at this image at 200% ?!

-- hide signature --

https://www.flickr.com/photos/marcoc/
"When words become unclear, I shall focus with photographs. When images become inadequate, I shall be content with silence." Ansel Adams.

 Marco Cinnirella's gear list:Marco Cinnirella's gear list
Sony a99 II Sony Alpha a99 Fujifilm X-H1 Sony a7 III Fujifilm X-T3
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Flat view
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
JNR
JNR
JNR
JNR
JNR
ForumParentFirstPrevious
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow