DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

R7 First Shots with RF 100-500, close-up with butterflies

Started 9 months ago | User reviews thread
charlyw64 Contributing Member • Posts: 717
Re: Hilariously wrong on so many levels

Alastair Norcross wrote:

charlyw64 wrote:

Alastair Norcross wrote:

charlyw64 wrote:

Mike Engles wrote:

I have to agree. What really is worrying as so many images get a lot of praise, when no one actually looks hard enough, to justify the praise.

That's a problem, I was a member of a macro photography group and I dared to point out all these inevitable (it's physics, hey) problem areas but they followed the tradition that Horatio Nelson started when he took the telescope to his blind eye and facing the Spanish Armada exclaimed that he saw no enemy ships.

What an absolutely hilarious misfire of a reference!

Nope, I was making an as correct reference as those guys made as an excuse why those artefacts don't matter...

Try a bit harder. As a first attempt at excusing incompetence that is pretty feeble.

You still don't get it. The reasons those stacking users put forward were as correct as my incorrect anecdote - not even in the slightest, they tried to defend the indefensible.

The shots in this thread are not only badly riddled with stacking artefacts but also are not indicative of the image quality of the camera because of all the processing of the stacking software.

Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow