Re: I would take RF 85 f 2 IS macro
KariP wrote:
atolk wrote:
I don't strictly speaking NEED a portrait lens because I don't shoot all that many portraits, and my EF 70-200mm f/2.8 and EF 85mm f/1.8 are adequate, but I have the bokeh envy from all the FB posts and YouTube reviews, and I know that I am supposed to want a prime lens for sharpness (I think my old 85mm 1.8 has issues), so I am thinking about getting a lens that I don't need but will love and use a lot. And just in time for a requested senior shoot. Make the customer's friends and family ooh and aah and start knocking my door down for more sessions.
Let's say the RF 85mm f/1.2 at $2,699 sets the upper limit of desirability and budget.
Let's say that something like Samyang/Rokinon 85mm f/1.4 AF at around $499 is an acceptable low end alternative. (Oh, and I just found out than an RF version exists, except it seems that it does not.)
Not to mention the $349 manual focus version with RF mount. An option? Why not?
And the three famous Sigma ART lenses comfortable occupying the middle tier and running between $1,049 and $1,499, commanding a cult following of sorts.
In your own humble professional opinion, what lens delivers the greatest wow/price ratio? Make your recommendation as succinct or verbose as you please.
I will buy the lens YOU recommend. And if I don't, we can have a nice gear chat.
Samples are always welcome! Especially if you do senior shoots.
Of some reason many of us think that f 1,2 - 1,4 is the thing in portrait photography - why ? Beautiful bokeh is of course nice, but the person in the picture should be photographed - not just the smooth background blur
IMO it is difficult and disturbing to use f 1.2 or 1,4 for taking portraits - DOF is practically always too shallow.
Not true at all. Check the half body, full body and environmental portraits (not only) in this thread.
One eye sharp and the other slightly blurred or a beautiful earring is not sharp at the same time as eyelashes ... I usually use something like f4-5,6 if it is a headshot.
It strongly depends on each picture and what do you want to express / emphasise with the photo. F/1.2 and 1.4 lens offer great space for DOF creativity and broaden the language a photographer can talk. So based on the context and aim anything from f/1.2 to f/whatever is pretty much fine in general.
I'm quite happy with RF24-105L when i take portraits - perspective and framing easy to control.
Did you ever own and regularily use any 85-135 (200)mm lens with f/<=2.0 (2.8)?
Anyway RF 85 f2 could be quite useful in low light/outdoors/evenings because it has IS. Price is OK and the lens has other uses too.
85mm is classic focal length of a portrait lens (FF)
-- hide signature --
Kari
I started SLR film photography in 1968. Now two systems: Fujifilm X-H1 + X-E3 and Canon FF gear 5dMkIV + R6