R5 with 100-500 + 1.4tc vs R7 with Canon 100-500
Re: Re shoot (more precise focusing)
3
drsnoopy wrote:
kristian1 wrote:
drsnoopy wrote:
Interesting comparison. On your second test, I still see a slight advantage to the R5.
However I have a question - what did you do to get the image scale identical? The R7 image should be 14% larger (800mm EFL vs 700mm FL). Did you zoom back to 437mm on the R7 to get 700mm EFL? In which case the different position of the zoom lens elements could affect the results. Or did you match the sizes by using different magnification on-screen in Lightroom? In which case apparent resolution is affected by interpolation (fractional magnifications show best screen resolution at 16.7, 25, 33.3,50, 66.7 and 75%, scales in between appear less sharp) - you would need about 87% on the R7 vs 100% on the R5.
Just interested to know what you did - not intended as a criticism, but to point out that there are confounding factors in such a test.
You forgot that r5 has higher mp count. It is 700mm at 45mp vs 800mm at 32mp.
Both images are at 300% of course , and lens is at 500mm in both cameras.
R5 image has slight higher magnification.
Kristian
Hi - naturally I know the R5 has a higher pixel count, as I own one, and the 100-500. However I do *not* see any difference in image size between the two images (R5 and R7 - both look identical) so if they are both had the lens set at “500mm”, you must have used a different image scale to make them appear the same size, as the R5 is at 700mm FL and the R7 at 800mm EFL, which is a 14% difference. They cannot both be at 300%, as there is a 38% difference between 32.5 and 45 MP. Please explain how you achieved the comparison at the same size on-screen - I’m genuinely interested, not trying to criticise!
If you divide 8192 the R5 resolution by the R7 resolution and multiply by 1.4 the tc magnification you end up.with 1.6 ish, the same number as the R7 crop!
So basically using the magnification of the tc and the extra pixels of the R5 will have the effect side by side of projecting the same images at 100/200/300% etc
|
Post
(hide subjects)
|
Posted by
|
When
|
|
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
3 |
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
3 |
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
7 months ago
|
|
|
|
|
1 month ago
|
|
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum
PPrevious
NNext
WNext unread
UUpvote
SSubscribe
RReply
QQuote
BBookmark
MMy threads
Color scheme?
Blue /
Yellow
Fujifilm's X-H2 is a high-resolution stills and video camera, that sits alongside the high-speed X-H2S at the pinnacle of the company's range of X-mount APS-C mirrorless cameras. We dug into what it does and what it means.
Holy Stone produces dozens of low-cost drone models aimed at consumers. We look at the HS710 and HS175D to see if they stack up to other sub-250g offerings. Are these secretly great or more like toys?
It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good?
After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts.
The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. We think it rises to the challenge.
Above $2500 cameras tend to become increasingly specialized, making it difficult to select a 'best' option. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder.
There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class.
What’s the best camera for around $2000? These capable cameras should be solid and well-built, have both the speed and focus to capture fast action and offer professional-level image quality. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing around $2000 and recommended the best.
Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens.
What's the best camera for shooting sports and action? Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best.
