nnowak
•
Veteran Member
•
Posts: 9,074
Re: Stop me from buying an M6 Mk ii before Canon stops the M line
2
KEG wrote:
nnowak wrote:
KEG wrote:
palombian wrote:
forest dream wrote:
KEG wrote
People wanting the smallest kit available.
Where are 22 mm, 32 mm and 11-22 for R7?
Coming soon .... under RF price 😛
Most probably ...
But as you can see with the two M lenses already adapted to RF, it is a quick fix and not looking very well.
I will continue to use my M equipment since it is really good, small and light, but it is an ending story.
As with EF, Canon never will make a full set of R lenses for APS-C. Someone who wants that has to go to Fuji, Olympus or 4/3.
Except for the (significantly) lower price compared to the R5, I do not regret not having waited for the R7. FF has some advantages too, this page is turned.
All R7 reviews tell what we already know since long, the 32 mpx sensor has more resolutions as a cropped R5 (and double that of the R6).
On R7 the only RF lenses which make sense are RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 16 and RF 50 and maybe RF 35, the other are too dark or expensive to make sense on a crop body.
and the 24mm f/1.8
image quality is unknown
Sample variation of the 15-45mm would be "image quality unknown". The RF 24mm will easily be better.
, 85mm f/2.0
R7 needs fast AF motor
Really? I must have missed the asterisk in the announcement that said the R7 only works with USM motors. None of the EF-M lenses are built with fast AF motors and I don't see anyone complaining about M6 II AF speed
, 15-30mm f/4.5-6.3
not released
Coming next month. It will be out before the R10. When is Canon releasing another EF-M lens?
, 100-400mm f/5.6-8.0
Too dark, especially at the long end
There have been numerous posts in this forum of people putting teleconverters on their EF-S 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 lenses. This will be no darker, while providing more reach
, and 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1
this one is maybe
This one absolutely. They should be offering it as the kit lens with the R7.
. You could even make a case for the 24-240mm f/4.0-6.3
this seem a bit weak in the IQ department and the usability of 38-384 mm lens is bit doubtful.
The EF-M 55-200mm is not exactly stellar in the IQ department. This RF lens offers far more range and is brighter on the wide end. Pair it with a future RF 11-22mm for 18-384mm equivalent in two lenses.
as it is relatively inexpensive and is no darker than the EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3. I am sure more than a few people will be trying the RF 600mm f/11 and 800mm f/11 on the crop bodies too. Not a lot of direct copies of EF-M lenses, but plenty of interesting options.