DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Wildlife Trip: M6 II + EF 100-400L vs R5/R6/R7 + RF 100-400/RF 100-500L?

Started 8 months ago | Discussions thread
Lost99999 Regular Member • Posts: 336
Re: Wildlife Trip: M6 II + EF 100-400L vs R5/R6/R7 + RF 100-400/RF 100-500L?

I think M system is great for having a small and capable kit, but it’s not the best for wildlife. I guess the new RF telelenses have the edge over EF glass, and the same holds true for the R vs M bodies —> so I would start investing in the R lineup. The rf100-400 is very affordable , you could rent an R5 or R6 body (as that for me quite pricy ) and later on buy an R7/R10 if you shoot wildlife more often.
if your normally not into wildlife, you could get the M6ii and an EF 100-400 second hand, which you could sell again after your trip m

check out also what is on stock !

 Lost99999's gear list:Lost99999's gear list
Canon EOS RP Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM Canon RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM Canon RF 50mm F1.8 STM Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
KEG
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
MAC
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow