Re: Micro 4/3rds vs. Full Frame
1
3D Gunner wrote:
c h u n k wrote:
What is your point? Seriously..............
Everything was clarified and resolved after Philzucker's answer, which correctly understood my observation, and gave additional explanations that clarified the rest of the issues under discussion.
Everyone understood your observation...It was just you who failed to understand what he meant...as it seems you've also had some comprehension issues with what I've written. (see below)
............................
For photojoe55, the bottom line is that smaller sensors can actually get bigger final magnifications and extended FoV, at cheaper cost than larger sensors (FF by example), but image quality depends on a number of technical factors in addition to the size of the sensors.
...................
Smaller sensors can not get an "extended" fov whatever that is supposed to mean. Im assuming you mean wider fov. That is obv wrong. I'll give the benefit of doubt and assume you were just spacing out when you wrote that or something....as I have for much of what you've said.
All subsequent divagations are due to you, who declared yourself a "ff purist" and insisted that 24x36mm sensor size is a reference for everything related to this subject. 🙂
What are you talking about? I specifically said I am NOT a FF purist. To the contrary, I said I prefer apsc for some things over my ff....And I never said anything even remotely close to a ff sensor being reference for everything. Are you okay?
I'm over this now. So pointless
-- hide signature --
**********-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-**********
Some of my photos here: https://flic.kr/ps/2i6XL3
“You're off to Great Places! Today is your day! Your mountain is waiting, So... get on your way!” --Dr. Seuss