Stop me from buying an M6 Mk ii before Canon stops the M line

fuyume wrote:

If Canon made any "mistake" with the M line, it was with the M mount, in the first place. There really was no reason to go to a smaller than 54 mm lens mount diameter, except that Canon never foresaw mirrorless cameras displacing SLRs. The M was intended to compete with Four-Thirds.

Ten years later, we can see the writing on the wall. Canon is attempting to close an unfortunate chapter in their history, has shifted back to 54 mm lenses with the RF mount, is now producing APS-C cameras in the R line, and will in short order discontinue the M line because it simply does not make economic sense to continue to make three different lens mounts. As it stands, Canon has released no new M lenses in four years.

The R line cannot replace the M line...yet. But it soon will. That doesn't mean the M line isn't capable of great photography, and as of obsolescence, well, my 1977 Nikon FM body still works. Not that I expect digital cameras of 2022 to still be functional in 45 years (the FM is fully mechanical aside from the light meter), but they will still be great cameras for some time to come.

I won't tell you not to buy an M6mkII, if it does what you need it to do, today and for the foreseeable future. I myself am trying to justify *not* buying an M50mkII and EF-M 22 mm f/2 STM.

people keep saying writing is on the wall and soon, but then they want one ...

...and there is nothing else like having one

hmm, maybe that writing on the wall ain't going to happen, at least not soon or in short order