DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

Canon Road Trip in BC - Canada Tried the RF 28-70 and love it

Started 10 months ago | Discussions thread
EOSSpeedLite Contributing Member • Posts: 640
Re: Strange...

MannyV wrote:

EOSSpeedLite wrote:

It makes no sense to buy both RF 24-70L f2.8 and RF 28-70L f2 lenses. The only reason would be to collect them both.

The better of the two is the f2 model, which I have. The f2.8 is a great lens too, but the f2 is more magical and more flexible of the two for its f2 aperture.

I held the f2 during a 2 week Paris trip, averaging 10 miles per day walking, and I did not find the lens too heavy, nor too big. And it balances perfectly on the body if one knows how to hold that kit: from the belly of the lens.

You cannot go wrong with either, however, to own both smacks of hardware collector/vanity sensibilities.

For my use case it does make sense to keep the 24-70 f2.8. The RF 28-70 will be the lens for portraits and events. Otherwise it will be the 24-70 2.8. I am tempted to sell all my primes though as I doubt I will pick up my primes after I get the 28-70.

The RF 28-70L f2 is a great event/wedding lens.  However, for portraits, there are far, far better lenses like these:

  1. RF 85L f1.2
  2. RF 50L f1.2
  3. RF 85 f2
  4. EF 135L f2
  5. EF 85L f1.4
  6. EF 100L f2.8

The problem with f2 is that it's not f1.2, nor f1.4, nor f1.8, so it's not going to give you the awesome bokeh, nor separation that those faster primes will give.

So what use-cases would make sense for one to keep both RF 28-70L f2 and RF 24-70L f2.8?

-- hide signature --

The best photographers talk about pictures & techniques. Posers & Fanboys talk about brands.

 EOSSpeedLite's gear list:EOSSpeedLite's gear list
Canon EOS R5 Canon EF 135mm F2L USM Canon EF 8-15mm f/4L Fisheye USM Canon Extender EF 2x III Canon EF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6L IS II +12 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow