For about the same price..RF 70-200mm F/4 or EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS iii ?

Started 8 months ago | Questions thread
thunder storm Senior Member • Posts: 8,906
Re: For about the same price..RF 70-200mm F/4 or EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS iii ?

Roman Dreyer wrote:

I would love to have a bigger size and more weight and have that useless extra background blur, useless extra smoothness in bokeh quality, that useless extra light or useless doubling of my shutter speed.

I hate a light weight wallet, that's the only disadvantage of the f/2.8 for me.

Unless you have specific photo needs,

If a need is specific and if a preference is a need is pretty boring semantics.  I know my preference:  f/2.8.  My used Sigma Sports is 2.5 times the weight, but the RF f/4.0 costs 2.5 times more, while the Sigma gives me twice the light.

-- hide signature --

45 is more than enough, but 500.000 isn't

 thunder storm's gear list:thunder storm's gear list
Canon EOS 6D Canon EOS M6 II Canon EOS R5 Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Canon EF 35-80mm f/4.0-5.6 III +22 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
KEG
KEG
KEG
KEG
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow