DPReview.com is closing April 10th - Find out more

An un-stabilized brick?

Started Apr 14, 2022 | Discussions thread
fernandojval
fernandojval Regular Member • Posts: 428
Re: An un-stabilized brick?
2

I am also not a professional. All hobby photography. I had the 16-55mm, compared to the 18-55mm it's big, heavy and (on my lens) the rubber on the zoom ring dilated twice. I came to the conclusion that it would not make better photos than with the 18-55, so I sold it.
Now I am waiting for the stabilized brick: Tamron 17-70 f.2.8. Stabilized, water resistant, weighs less, reaches 70mm and is cheaper.

 fernandojval's gear list:fernandojval's gear list
Fujifilm X-T4 Fujifilm XF 50-140mm F2.8 Fujifilm XF 70-300 F4-5.6 R LM OIS WR Tamron 17–70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD +3 more
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow